PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14585328

Direct comparison of microarray gene expression profiles between non-amplification and a modified cDNA amplification procedure applicable for needle biopsy tissues.

Abstract

Global gene expression profiling by cDNA microarray analysis has been used to discover the biomarkers for early diagnosis of various cancers, subclassing cancer type, and prediction of patient's treatment outcome. The information provided by gene expression profiling may contribute to the design of molecular mechanism-based strategies for cancer prevention and/or treatment. However, the standard procedure for cDNA microarray analysis requires 5mug of good quality total RNA as starting material for each target preparation reaction. Thus, there is a limit for needle biopsy samples, laser capture microdissected tissues, or flow-sorted cells to successfully utilize the microarray technology. In order to profile the gene expression of needle biopsy tissue, we have modified the standard protocol by carrying out cDNA amplification after cDNA synthesis. We compared percentage present calls, absent calls, reproducibility, and concordance in needle biopsy samples processed by standard microarray protocol (cDNA non-amplification method) and our modified protocol (cDNA amplification method). The results showed that cDNA amplification method provided high reproducibility, representation, and concordance with the standard cDNA non-amplification method. We have successfully analyzed the gene expression profiles of needle biopsy tissues using the modified method without significantly changing the expression profiles. These results suggest that the global gene expression profiles of small biopsy samples can be achieved by our modified method to facilitate the analysis of gene expression profiles for clinical application.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yiwei Li, Shadan Ali, Philip A Philip, Fazlul H Sarkar. 2003. Direct comparison of microarray gene expression profiles between non-amplification and a modified cDNA amplification procedure applicable for needle biopsy tissues.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-090x(03)00105-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗