PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14589481

Medication-assisted spinal manipulation.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The acceptance of spinal manipulation as a reasonable method of treating certain patients with spinal pain over the past decade has led to a renewed interest and increased use of these techniques performed in conjunction with commonly used medications and procedures. Manual therapy is increasingly being used in conjunction with anesthetics, sedatives or analgesics as well as local, epidural and intra-articular injections. PURPOSE: This report provides a review of the literature and presents a description of current clinical practice methods for the application of the different techniques of medication-assisted spinal manipulation therapy followed by a discussion of the current clinical support and the published indications, contraindications and complications for each of these procedures. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This technical report integrates a literature review with information gathered through personal interviews, review of medicine-assisted manipulation courses and observations of clinical procedures. METHODS: A PubMed search from 1966 to the present was performed to identify appropriate articles concerning the combination of spinal manipulation therapy with such medical procedures as the use of anesthetic, conscious sedation, local injection of analgesic, anti-inflammatory and proliferant agents and intra-articular injections. Additional articles and information were gathered through review of pertinent references, attendance of various technique specific seminars and communication with experts familiar with these procedures. RESULTS: Four categories of medication-assisted manipulation were identified: manipulation under general anesthesia or sedation, manipulation under epidural anesthesia with or without epidural steroid injection, manipulation under joint anesthesia/analgesia, and manipulation with injectants, such as steroids or proliferant agents. The literature consists primarily of case reports and case series with two randomized controlled trials and one cohort study. CONCLUSIONS: Medicine-assisted spinal manipulation therapies have a relatively long history of clinical use and have been reported in the literature for over 70 years. However, evidence for the effectiveness of these protocols remains largely anecdotal, based on case series mimicking many other surgical and conservative approaches for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes of musculoskeletal origin. There is, however, sufficient theoretical basis and positive results from case series to warrant further controlled trials on these techniques.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Frank J Kohlbeck, Scott Haldeman. Medication-assisted spinal manipulation.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00196-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prophylactic intravenous preloading for regional analgesia in labour.

BACKGROUND: Reduced uterine blood flow from maternal hypotension may contribute to fetal heart rate changes which are common following regional analgesia (epidural or spinal or combined spinal-epidural (CSE)) during labour. Intravenous fluid preloading may help to reduce maternal hypotension but using lower doses of local anaesthetic, and opioid only blocks, may reduce the need for preloading. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of prophylactic intravenous fluid preloading before regional analgesia during labour on maternal and fetal well-being. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (19 February 2004). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing prophylactic intravenous preloading before regional analgesia during labour with a control group (dummy or no preloading). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Six studies are included (473 participants). In one epidural trial using high-dose local anaesthetic, preloading with intravenous fluids was shown to counteract the hypotension which frequently follows traditional epidural analgesia (relative risk (RR) 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.53; 102 women). This trial was also associated with a reduction in fetal heart rate abnormalities (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.83; 102 women); no differences were detected in other perinatal and maternal outcomes for this trial and another high-dose epidural trial. In the two epidural low-dose anaesthetic trials, no significant difference in maternal hypotension was found (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.48; 260 women), although they were underpowered to detect less than a very large effect. No significant differences were seen between groups in these trials for fetal heart rate abnormalities (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.05; 233 women). In the two CSE trials, no differences were reported between preloading and no preloading groups. In the spinal/opioid trial, the RR for hypotension was 0.89, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.83 (40 women) and 0.70, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.37 for fetal heart rate abnormalities (32 women). In the opioid only study (30 women), there were no instances of hypotension or fetal heart rate abnormalities in either group. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Preloading prior to traditional high-dose local anaesthetic blocks may have some beneficial fetal and maternal effects in healthy women. Low-dose epidural and CSE analgesia techniques may reduce the need for preloading. The studies reviewed were too small to show whether preloading is beneficial for women having regional analgesia during labour using the lower-dose local anaesthetics or opioids. Further investigation of low-dose epidural or CSE (including opioid only) blocks, and the risks and benefits of intravenous preloading for women with pregnancy complications, is required.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗

Effects of thoracic epidural anaesthesia on intestinal microvascular perfusion in a rodent model of normotensive endotoxaemia.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether sympathetic blockade by means of thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA) increases intestinal perfusion during normotensive endotoxaemia. DESIGN: A prospective, randomised and controlled animal study. SETTING: Animal laboratory in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Sprague-Dawley male rats. INTERVENTIONS: The rats were anaesthetised with urethane and ketamine, mechanically ventilated and haemodynamically monitored. Lidocaine or saline were infused continuously via thoracic epidural catheters followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (1.5 mg/kg per h). Densities of perfused and non-perfused capillaries (i.e., with and without erythrocyte perfusion, respectively) as well as erythrocyte velocity in both the mucosa and the muscularis of the terminal ileum were determined using intravital microscopy. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Measurements were performed at baseline, after 30 min of epidural infusion as well as after 60 and 120 min of lipopolysaccharide infusion. In animals receiving TEA, mean arterial pressure and heart rate were significantly reduced throughout the experiment. In the muscularis the endotoxaemia-induced increase in non-perfused capillaries was absent with epidural lidocaine (0 [0/0] versus 39 [36/137] cm(-1), median [25(th)/75(th) percentile]), whereas in the mucosa perfused capillary density declined to a greater extent than in controls (-47 [-53/-23]%) versus -19 [-34/+10]%, p<0.05). Erythrocyte velocity decreased with endotoxaemia and was not influenced by epidural lidocaine. CONCLUSIONS: Microvascular perfusion data during endotoxaemia show a redistribution of blood flow towards the mucosa. TEA seems to impede this redistribution resulting in improved muscularis and worsened mucosal microvascular perfusion.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗