PubMed · 14614837
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
David C Queller, Joan E Strassmann. 2003-11-11. Eusociality.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.043
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Many electric fish species modulate their electric organ discharges (EODs) to produce transient social signals that vary in number and structure. In Apteronotus leptorhynchus, males modulate their EOD more often than females, whereas in Apteronotus albifrons, males and females produce similar numbers of modulations. Sex differences in the number of EOD modulations in A. leptorhynchus are associated with sex differences in substance P in the diencephalic nucleus that controls transient EOD modulations, the CP/PPn. These sex differences in substance P have been hypothesized to regulate sex differences in the production of EOD modulations. To comparatively test this hypothesis, we examined substance P immunoreactivity in the CP/PPn of male and female A. leptorhynchus and A. albifrons. Because the number of EOD modulations is sexually monomorphic in A. albifrons, we predicted no sex difference in substance P in the CP/PPn of this species. Contrary to this prediction, male A. albifrons had significantly more substance P in the CP/PPn than females. This suggests that sex differences in substance P are not sufficient for controlling sex differences in the number of EOD modulations. Modulation structure (frequency excursion and/or duration), however, is also sexually dimorphic in A. leptorhynchus and is another possible behavioral correlate of the sexually dimorphic distribution of substance P. The present study found pronounced sex differences in the structure of EOD modulations in A. albifrons similar to those in A. leptorhynchus. Thus, sex differences in substance P may influence sex differences in the structure, rather than the number, of EOD modulations.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The jamming avoidance response of the weakly electric fish Gymnarchus niloticus relies on determining the sign of the frequency difference (Df) between the fish's own electric organ discharge (EOD) and that of a neighbor, which is achieved by comparing modulations in amplitude (AM) and phase (PM) that result from the summation of their EODs. These two stimulus features are processed in separate pathways that converge in the torus semicircularis on combination-sensitive neurons, many of which are selective for the sign of Df. We recorded extracellular single-unit responses to independent stimulation with AM and PM and combined AM-PM stimulation to determine how sign selectivity is established. Responses to AM and PM frequently summated nonlinearly, leading to sign-selective responses as a result of facilitation to the preferred sign of Df and/or suppression to the nonpreferred sign of Df. Facilitation typically occurred when responses to AM and PM were aligned, whereas suppression typically occurred when they were offset. By experimentally manipulating the degree of alignment between these two responses, we found that the summed response was dependent on their relative timing. In addition, we found a unique class of units that were sensitive to differences in amplitude between two body surfaces. This sensitivity rendered such units immune to the problem of orientation ambiguity, in which the sign selectivity of a single neuron reverses with changes in stimulus orientation. We discuss potential synaptic mechanisms for driving nonlinear responses in these and other combination-sensitive neurons.