PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14615635

Chiasmal syndromes.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review of the more recent literature and testing strategies in patients with chiasmal syndromes focuses on the clinical evaluation and management of these patients. Visual loss is often the initial manifestation of disorders involving the optic chiasm. Hemianopic defects and preferential involvement of the temporal visual field are the earliest and most common visual deficits. Progression of the lesion may cause compression of adjacent structures, including the optic nerves and cavernous sinuses, and may result in more profound visual loss, ocular motor deficits, and hypopituitarism. RECENT FINDINGS: Although a number of modalities have been used to assess visual function in patients with chiasmal disorders, perimetry remains the most effective means of detecting and following the visual deficit. SUMMARY: Most chiasmal syndromes can be categorized as intrinsic (thickening of the chiasm itself) or extrinsic (compression of the chiasm from an adjacent structure). Magnetic resonance imaging is the best mode of neuroimaging for most chiasmal lesions and may also provide clues to the etiology of an isolated chiasmal syndrome.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rod Foroozan. 2003. Chiasmal syndromes.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00055735-200312000-00002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Capturing the benefit of vision restoration therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Vision restoration therapy has shown promise as a treatment strategy to improve visual field deficits in patients with lesions of the brain or optic nerve. Objective measures of its efficacy, however, have remained controversial. A review of the current theories supporting the reported benefits of vision restoration therapy, and the dissenting opinions, reconsiders vision restoration therapy as an emerging therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: The benefits of vision restoration therapy have been challenged by a study suggesting that no improvement exists with careful control of fixation. Alternatively, others suggest that eye movements are not induced by vision restoration therapy. Functional imaging studies demonstrate the potential role of plasticity in vision restoration therapy. While the exact mechanism remains to be elucidated, subjective improvement in daily functioning is reported in a significant percentage of patients. SUMMARY: Vision restoration therapy is a noninvasive, home-based strategy for the rehabilitation of patients with visual field loss caused by structural or ischemic damage. While subjective benefits in functional status have been reported by patients following completion of the program, debate centers around the inadequacy of the methods used to document its efficacy. Until such a method is validated by carefully controlled studies, subjective improvement in visual function stands alone as evidence of vision restoration therapy's benefit.

Hemianopsia↗

NovaVision: vision restoration therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this article is to review the controversial findings for NovaVision's vision restoration therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: It has been claimed that NovaVision's computerized therapy results in expansion of the visual field in optic nerve and occipital lesions, but the outcome has been challenged on the grounds of unsatisfactory perimetric control of central fixation and disputed mechanisms. SUMMARY: In clinical practice NovaVision's therapy should not currently gain acceptance in view of unacceptable perimetric standards and equivocal results. Possible effects on a relative scotoma at the edge of a lesion have not been adequately explored. In the interim, research should also be focused on compensatory eye movement strategies.

Hemianopsia↗

Hemianopia.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Hemianopsia↗