PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14623521

Comparison between aromatase inhibitors and sequential use.

Abstract

The biochemical efficacy of aromatase inhibitors and inactivators in vivo may be determined by two types of methods; by measuring plasma or tissue estrogen levels, or assessment of the conversion of the androgen substrate (in practice, androstenedione) into estrogens (estrone) by the use of tracer methods. While methods to determine plasma and tissue estrogens are limited through lack of sensitivity required to measure the very low concentrations recorded in postmenopausal women on treatment with these compounds, measurement of in vivo aromatization is an extensive procedure, applicable to a limited number of patients only. While we may correlate the mean level of aromatase inhibition achieved with different compounds to clinical efficacy, data correlating individual estrogen suppression to clinical outcome among patients treated with a specific compound is limited. The now well-characterized phenomenon of lack of cross-resistance between non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors and steroidal aromatase inactivators are likely due to biochemical effects not related to differences in total body aromatase inhibition.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Per Eystein Lønning. 2003. Comparison between aromatase inhibitors and sequential use.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-0760(03)00367-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Differential Effectiveness of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy According to Menopausal Status, Body Mass Index, and Molecular Subtype in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

The effectiveness of adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) varies according to menopausal status, body mass index (BMI), and tumor biology. We evaluated the association between selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), aromatase inhibitors (AIs), and BC-specific mortality according to menopausal status, BMI, and molecular subtype in a nationwide Korean cohort. We analyzed data from 31,030 patients with HR+ BC who were registered in the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry, diagnosed between 2000 and 2008, and followed through 2013. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for BC-specific mortality after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Of the 31,030 patients, 19,634 received SERM therapy, and 3,354 received AI therapy. SERM use was associated with lower BC-specific mortality in premenopausal women (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.91), whereas AI therapy was more strongly associated with lower BC-specific mortality among postmenopausal women (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.94). Lower BC-specific mortality was observed among patients with a BMI ≥ 23 kg/m² who received SERM (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98) or AI therapy (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99). The strongest association with lower BC-specific mortality was observed in postmenopausal women with luminal B tumors (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.83). The association between adjuvant endocrine therapy and BC-specific mortality differed according to menopausal status, BMI, and molecular subtype. These findings suggest that menopausal status, BMI, and molecular subtype are important considerations when evaluating endocrine treatment strategies.

Aromatase Inhibitors↗