PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14624695

Pleural drainage using central venous catheters.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the use of a single lumen 16 G central venous catheter for the drainage of uncomplicated pleural effusions in intensive care unit patients. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in two intensive care units of university-affiliated hospitals. The study involved 10 intensive care unit patients with non-loculated large effusions. A 16 G central venous catheter was inserted at the bedside without ultrasound guidance using the Seldinger technique. The catheter was left in situ until radiological resolution of the effusion. RESULTS: Fifteen sets of data were obtained. The mean and standard deviation of the volumes drained at 1, 6 and 24 hours post catheter insertion were 454 +/- 241 ml, 756 +/- 403 ml and 1010 +/- 469 ml, respectively. The largest volume drained in a single patient was 6030 ml over 11 days. The longest period for which the catheter remained in situ without evidence of infection was 14 days. There were no instances of pneumothorax, hemothorax, re-expansion pulmonary edema and catheter blockage/ disconnections. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an indwelling 16 G central venous catheter is efficacious in draining uncomplicated large pleural effusions. It is well tolerated by patients and is associated with minimal complications. It has the potential to avoid repeated thoracentesis or the use of large-bore chest tubes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kulgit Singh, Shi Loo, Rinaldo Bellomo. 2003-10-15. Pleural drainage using central venous catheters.. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2393

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A novel technique in selective venous sampling in the localization of parathyroid tumours utilizing a micro-wire and standardized catheter.

Selective venous sampling (SVS) is a useful technique to localize a number of hormone-producing tumours, such as parathyroid tumours, when other imaging techniques are inconclusive. Typically, a 5 French selective single end-hole catheter and standard hydrophilic wire are utilized to access the required vessels and an attempt made to withdraw blood. However, most interventional radiologists are familiar with the difficulty and limited success in withdrawing venous blood through an end-hole catheter. We describe a simple, cheap and novel technique utilizing a micro-wire that we have developed in our interventional suite to overcome this common problem. Having reached the target site with the selective end-hole catheter, a Tuohy Borst adapter is attached to the catheter end. A 0.018-inch micro-wire is then inserted through the selective end-hole catheter such that the distal wire tip exits the distal catheter tip. The purpose of the micro-wire exiting the catheter is to both straighten the catheter tip to a position parallel to the vessel, allowing easier aspiration as well as physically preventing blockage of the catheter by the vein intimal wall collapse on suction. The 5-ml sample required for PTH assay is then successfully obtained via the Tuohy Borst adapter.

Catheterization, Central Venous↗

[Subclavian thrombosis after port system implantation].

The use of implanted central venous catheters with ports has become almost irreplaceable in clinical treatment of cancer patients with advanced disease. It improves the patient's quality of life and simplifies medical treatment. For safe use during outpatient follow-up treatment, possible complications such as wound infections, thrombosis or even pulmonary embolism have to be considered. The incidence of catheter-associated thrombosis in cancer patients has been estimated as 25-66% in screening evaluations. Clinical symptoms were present in only in 6-28% of all patients with diagnosed thromboses. We report on a patient with metastatic malignant melanoma, who developed a deep arm vein thrombosis two weeks after port implantation. The prognosis of deep arm vein thrombosis is determined by the development of pulmonary embolism (8-36%). In such cases, early diagnosis and treatment are essential for the patient's survival.

Catheterization, Central Venous↗