PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 14633801

Hematology grants workshop.

Mortimer Poncz·Robert Iannone·Ellen M Werner
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Uppermost among the many concerns of young researchers is acquiring funding for beginning a career as a clinician-scientist. This chapter is targeted specifically at those individuals considering an academic physician-scientist career and those on the verge of becoming independent researchers. In Section I, Drs. Poncz and Iannone discuss the Mentored Career Development Award (K08). They summarize the application process, highlighting the critical components of a successful application and what the review process entails. In Section II, Dr. Werner discusses what applicants need to know about the NIH Institutes' program, review, and grants management function; the different NIH staff whom applicants should contact during the various stages of the grants process; and the important sections and key phrases in NIH Program Announcements for career development awards.

Explore related subjects

Consensus Statements as TopicHematologyMentorsNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Research Support as TopicTraining SupportUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mortimer Poncz, Robert Iannone, Ellen M Werner. 2003. Hematology grants workshop.. https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2003.1.590

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Holiday waistline. Time to consensus: the effect of the stomach on consensus decision-making at large conferences.

INTRODUCTION: The factors affecting decision-making at consensus conferences are not well understood. This paper studies the complex association between time to consensus (TTC) and the timing and quality of food, as well as the self-reported level of frustration (PITA factor) with the question at hand. METHODS: We came, we saw, we ate. RESULTS: There was an association between the TTC and the time to eating, especially lunch. There was a trend to faster TTC the better the researchers rated the food. The speed of decision-making was also increased when the PITA score was high, especially late in the day. INTERPRETATION: Organizers of large consensus conferences need to be aware of these factors in decision-making and should try to use them to get more controversial items voted to their satisfaction.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗