PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1463691

Community based cancer support groups: an undervalued resource?

Abstract

A pilot study was set up and to identify the local community based cancer support groups and to examine the links these groups and the staff of the regional and district general hospitals. The objective was to evaluate the current role of cancer support groups and identify strategies which would improve communication. Results of the study indicated that local support groups played an important role in providing support to cancer patients in the community. Hospital staff were not well informed about support groups and felt uncertain about their use as a resource for patients. There was a need to improve communication between local cancer support groups and hospital staff in order to offer a more comprehensive service to patients. Any strategies developed to improve communication depend on finding ways in which lay care and professional health care can work together. Specific recommendations were made as a result of the research and a number of initiatives undertaken, including a local directory of community resources and a forum where representatives from the local support groups can meet with hospital staff.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Bradburn, E J Maher, J Young, T Young. 1992. Community based cancer support groups: an undervalued resource?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0936-6555(05)81131-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗