PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14665353

Voiding impairment after prostate biopsy: does tamsulosin treatment before biopsy decrease this morbidity?

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy with voiding impairment and to investigate whether tamsulosin treatment given before prostate biopsy could improve voiding impairment after the procedure. METHODS: The study included 66 consecutive patients who underwent TRUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy and were prospectively randomized. Of the patients, 33 were treated with tamsulosin (0.4 mg daily) beginning the day before the biopsy procedure for 30 days. The remaining 33 patients underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy only with no tamsulosin treatment and served as the control group. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximal flow rate (Qmax) were recorded in all patients before the procedure and on postbiopsy days 7 and 30. All patients were followed up and questioned about difficulty voiding and acute urinary retention after the procedure. RESULTS: No difference was found in the mean IPSS and Qmax before biopsy between the two groups (P >0.05). Acute urinary retention after the biopsy procedure developed in 1 patient in the tamsulosin group and 3 patients in the control group. The rate of voiding difficulty on postprocedure day 7 was significantly lower in the tamsulosin group (9.09%) than in the control group (42.42%), a statistically significant difference (P <0.001). In the tamsulosin group, the IPSS was significantly decreased on postbiopsy days 7 and 30 compared with the baseline value (P <0.05 and P <0.001, respectively), and Qmax was significantly elevated on postbiopsy day 30 (P <0.01). In the control group, the IPSS was significantly greater (P <0.05) and the Qmax was significantly lower (P <0.001) on postbiopsy day 7 compared with the baseline value. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that TRUS-guided prostate biopsy leads to transient voiding impairment, and therefore, the alpha(1)-blocker tamsulosin before biopsy and for a brief interval afterward may decrease this morbidity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Murat Bozlu, Ercüment Ulusoy, Erdal Doruk, Selahittin Cayan, Bülent Canpolat, Paul F Schellhammer, Erdem Akbay. 2003. Voiding impairment after prostate biopsy: does tamsulosin treatment before biopsy decrease this morbidity?. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.07.006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular targets of doxazosin in human prostatic stromal cells.

BACKGROUND: We used cDNA microarray analysis to obtain insights into the mechanisms of action of doxazosin, an alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor antagonist used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Hierarchical clustering analysis and significance analysis of microarray (SAM) were performed to identify genes differentially expressed between untreated stromal cells cultured from normal tissue and BPH, and changes in gene expression induced by doxazosin. Transcript levels of selected genes were validated by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS: Hierarchical clustering analyses separated untreated normal and BPH cells. Sixty-seven genes whose expression varied at least twofold after doxazosin treatment in both normal and BPH cells were identified, as were 93 genes differentially regulated in normal versus BPH cells. Molecular targets consistent with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha-related activity were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Normal versus BPH stromal cells differ in global gene transcription. Doxazosin induced gene expression changes relevant to proliferation/apoptosis, immune defense, cell-cell signaling/signal transduction, and transcriptional regulation.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗

No risk of drug-associated liver injury with alpha1-adrenoreceptor blocking agents in men with BPH: results from an observational study using the GPRD.

PURPOSE: To compare the risk of liver injury in men treated with alpha1-blockers against that in a similar non-exposed population. METHODS: Using a study population registered on the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD) we performed (a) a retrospective cohort analysis amongst men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) indicative of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) comparing the incidence of liver injury in men exposed to alpha1-blockers with the incidence in those not exposed, and (b) two nested case-control studies looking at risk factors associated with the development of liver injury compared with age- or practice-matched controls. RESULTS: Amongst 45,851 men with LUTS/BPH, 9666 were exposed to an alpha1-blocker and 154 were identified with drug-induced/idiopathic liver injury. The crude incidence of liver injury in men with LUTS/BPH exposed to an alpha1-blocker was not statistically significantly different from that in the unexposed population (13.9 vs. 11.0 cases per 10,000 exposed years: incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.28 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64, 2.31]). In the case-control analyses, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of liver injury associated with exposure to alpha1-blockers compared with no use was not statistically significant (age-matched OR 0.92 [95%CI: 0.43, 1.97]; practice-matched OR 0.98 [95%CI: 0.45, 2.16]). Our analyses confirmed an association between liver injury and alcohol consumption as well as exposure to various classes of drugs known to be potentially hepatotoxic. CONCLUSIONS: This study could not offer any evidence to support an association between exposure to alpha1-blockers and liver injury in men with LUTS/BPH.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗

Metamodulation of a spinal locomotor network by nitric oxide.

Flexibility in the output of spinal networks can be accomplished by the actions of neuromodulators; however, little is known about how the process of neuromodulation itself may be modulated. Here we investigate the potential "meta"-modulatory hierarchy between nitric oxide (NO) and noradrenaline (NA) in Xenopus laevis tadpoles. NO and NA have similar effects on fictive swimming; both potentiate glycinergic inhibition to slow swimming frequency and GABAergic inhibition to reduce episode durations. In addition, both modulators have direct effects on the membrane properties of motor neurons. Here we report that antagonism of noradrenergic pathways with phentolamine dramatically influences the effect of the NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) on swimming frequency, but not its effect on episode durations. In contrast, scavenging extracellular NO with 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (PTIO) does not influence any of the effects of NA on fictive swimming. These data place NO above NA in the metamodulatory hierarchy, strongly suggesting that NO works via a noradrenergic pathway to control glycine release but directly promotes GABA release. We confirmed this possibility using intracellular recordings from motor neurons. In support of a natural role for NO in the Xenopus locomotor network, PTIO not only antagonized all of the effects of SNAP on swimming but also, when applied on its own, modulated both swimming frequency and episode durations in addition to the underlying glycinergic and GABAergic pathways. Collectively, our results illustrate that NO and NA have parallel effects on motor neuron membrane properties and GABAergic inhibition, but that NO serially metamodulates glycinergic inhibition via NA.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗