PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14666494

Setting dietary guidelines: the US process.

Abstract

Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans has been issued jointly by the US Departments of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Agriculture (USDA) every five years since 1980. The Dietary Guidelines form the cornerstone of federal nutrition policy and provide the basis for all federal nutrition education activities. Beginning with the 1985 edition, USDA and HHS have appointed a Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee of prominent experts in nutrition and health to review recent advances in scientific and medical knowledge and to recommend revisions of the Dietary Guidelines, if warranted, to the Secretaries of HHS and USDA. The Committee's deliberations are informed by evidence-based reviews, consensus documents, peer-reviewed research studies, and by written and oral public comments. The Departments review the Committee's recommendations and rationale, make any necessary revisions, and jointly issue the final edition. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans is based on the best available science. Ultimately, its goal is to promote better health through food choices and physical activity. The Dietary Guidelines have been referred to as a "gold standard" of nutrition advice, amid often confusing messages about nutrition and health.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kathryn Y McMurry. 2003. Setting dietary guidelines: the US process.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2003.09.031

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes.

A recently published article by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust presents guidelines for selecting and evaluating health status and health-related quality of life measures used in health outcomes research. In their article, they propose a number of validation and performance criteria with which to evaluate such self-report measures. We provide an alternate, yet complementary, perspective by extending the types of measurement models which are available to the instrument designer. During psychometric development or selection of a Patient Reported Outcome measure it is necessary to determine which, of the five types of measurement models, the measure is based on; 1) a Multiple Effect Indicator model, 2) a Multiple Cause Indicator model, 3) a Single Item Effect Indicator model, 4) a Single Item Cause Indicator model, or 5) a Mixed Multiple Indicator model. Specification of the measurement model has a major influence on decisions about item and scale design, the appropriate application of statistical validation methods, and the suitability of the resulting measure for a particular use in clinical and population-based outcomes research activities.

Guidelines as Topic↗

International guidance on the establishment of quality assurance programmes for radioactivity measurement in nuclear medicine.

A new guidance document for the implementation of quality assurance (QA) programmes for nuclear medicine radioactivity measurement, produced by the International Atomic Energy Agency, is described. The proposed programme is based on the principles of ISO 17025 and will enable laboratories, particularly in developing countries, to provide consistent, safe and effective radioactivity measurement services to the nuclear medicine community.

Guidelines as Topic↗

A cautionary tale.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Guidelines as Topic↗