PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14666505

[Renal osteodystrophy Guidelines].

Abstract

Renal ostedystrophy (ROD) is a major long-term complication in uremic patients. Bone histomorphometry still remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of ROD. However, the low acceptance grade by patients makes bone biopsy a rarely performed and not easily repeatable investigation. No other instrumental assessment has been proved as yet to have sufficient sensitivity for ROD diagnosis. Many biochemical markers have been proposed for a diagnostic role, but few have a real predictive diagnostic value. Serum intact PTH (i-PTH) levels are thought to represent a good predictor of bone lesions. However, although a i-PTH level greater than 450 pg/mL and lower than 120 pg/mL may well predict high and low bone turnover disease respectively, in the wide range of values defined by the above border levels i-PTH does not have a predictive role for ROD. There is as yet no definite proof that the recently developed PTH assays might increase their diagnostic sensitivity. Bone alkaline phosphatase is a more reliable index of bone turnover than i-PTH levels. With regards to Al overload, given that an iron overburden is excluded, serum Al levels lower than 30 ug/L are seldom associated with increased Al deposition; conversely, levels above 60 mg/L are highly diagnostic for Al overload. In the latter condition, a DFO test is recommended. The main goals of ROD treatment are a) to maintain serum i-PTH levels between 120 and 150 pg/mL; b) to bring the phosphate (Pi) concentration under 5.5 mg/dL, Ca concentration between 9.2 and 10.4 mg/dL, and the Ca x Pi product under 55 mg/dL; c) to bring Al concentration under 20 ug/L; and d) to target serum bicarbonate levels between 20 and 24 mmol/L. The main therapeutic approaches include: Dietary Pi intake control (< 1200 mg/day). Intestinal phosphate binding using calcium salts and sevelamer. Calcium salts must be used at a dosage that avoids Ca overload (< 23 g/day). If Pi control is not reached, Mg and Al salts may be added at a dose lower than 2 g/day and for less than 3 months. Appropriate dialysis dose (KT/V > 1.2) and dialysis time (consider increased dialysis duration or session number for a week). Ca concentration in dialysate and infusion fluids can range between 1.25 and 2.00 mmol/L, according to the dialysis technique and to maintain an appropriate Ca balance. Vitamin D should not be used when i-PTH levels are < 120 pg/mL and/or serum Ca > 11 mg/dL and/or Pi > 6.5 mg/dL. The vitamin D dose should be proportional to PTH levels, with a larger dose given as a bolus (23 ug twice or three times per week). The intravenous route should be preferred in the case of very high i-PTH (> 700 pg/mL) or after 3 months of unsuccessful oral treatment. PTX should be prescribed on the basis of the clinical, biochemical, and instrumental data. A 7/8 PTX, when possible, is the most advisable procedure. Bone transplant disease (BTD) is caused by a combination of previous uremic ROD and bone lesions occurring after renal transplantation, mainly secondary to steroid effect. The main clinical result of BTD is the osteopenicosteoporotic syndrome, which frequently results in bone fractures. The most effective treatment of BTD is a reduction of the cumulative steroid dose. No strong evidence has been produced as yet for a preventive role of either bisphosphonates or vitamin D supplementation on BTD.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Messa, Italian Society of Nephrology. [Renal osteodystrophy Guidelines].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14666505/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Lack of comparability of intact parathyroid hormone measurements among commercial assays for end-stage renal disease patients: implication for treatment decisions.

BACKGROUND: Variability among assays used to measure intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) is of particular concern because of the routine use of iPTH assay results to guide management of osteodystrophy and calcium metabolism in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which results from commercially available iPTH assays diverge from results obtained with the Nichols Allegro(R) Intact PTH immunoradiometric assay (IRMA), which was used as evidence in the development of the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guidelines. METHODS: We divided EDTA plasma from 46 dialysis patients with ESRD and measured iPTH values with the following commercially available iPTH assays: Nichols' Allegro iPTH IRMA, Nichols Advantage iPTH immunochemiluminescent assay (ICMA), Scantibodies' Total Intact PTH IRMA, DiaSorin's N-tact iPTH IRMA, DPC's Coat-A-Count iPTH IRMA, Roche's Elecsys iPTH ICMA, and DSL's Active iPTH IRMA. RESULTS: Method comparison showed considerable interassay differences in the measurement of iPTH in ESRD patients. IPTH values assessed by other methods ranged, on average, from 60% to 152% of the Nichols Allegro IRMA values. Of the 6 iPTH assays tested, only the Scantibodies Total Intact PT IRMA (P = 0.7554) and the Roche Elecsys iPTH ICMA (P = 0.1327) resulted in iPTH values not statistically different from those obtained with the Nichols Allegro iPTH IRMA. CONCLUSIONS: Noncomparability among iPTH assays remains a distinct problem for the management of ESRD patients. These results should be taken into consideration when determining the course of medical treatment based on measured iPTH concentrations.

Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder↗

Definition, evaluation, and classification of renal osteodystrophy: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).

Disturbances in mineral and bone metabolism are prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and are an important cause of morbidity, decreased quality of life, and extraskeletal calcification that have been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. These disturbances have traditionally been termed renal osteodystrophy and classified based on bone biopsy. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) sponsored a Controversies Conference on Renal Osteodystrophy to (1) develop a clear, clinically relevant, and internationally acceptable definition and classification system, (2) develop a consensus for bone biopsy evaluation and classification, and (3) evaluate laboratory and imaging markers for the clinical assessment of patients with CKD. It is recommended that (1) the term renal osteodystrophy be used exclusively to define alterations in bone morphology associated with CKD, which can be further assessed by histomorphometry, and the results reported based on a unified classification system that includes parameters of turnover, mineralization, and volume, and (2) the term CKD-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD) be used to describe a broader clinical syndrome that develops as a systemic disorder of mineral and bone metabolism due to CKD, which is manifested by abnormalities in bone and mineral metabolism and/or extra-skeletal calcification. The international adoption of these recommendations will greatly enhance communication, facilitate clinical decision-making, and promote the evolution of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines worldwide.

Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder↗