PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1467768

Do general practitioners facilitate the breast screening programme?

Abstract

Mammography uptake has been discouragingly low since the introduction of breast cancer screening in Northern Ireland. This questionnaire survey was undertaken to appraise the views of participating general practitioners (GPs) about mammography and the extent to which they followed good practice in facilitating the screening programme. Of 173 GPs, 152 returned a questionnaire. Approximately three-quarters of these GPs believed the screening programme was worthwhile for the eligible women on their list. When sent the prior notification lists from the screening unit, less than half of the GPs always checked the accuracy of patients' addresses. Fifty-five per cent of the GPs said they routinely took opportunities (as they arouse) during normal surgeries to counsel women about mammography and 90% did so in health promotion or well-woman clinics. Despite this, only 56% routinely recorded non-attendance in patients' case notes and less than 20% contacted non-attenders to advocate mammography. Such a pro-active approach was more commonly adopted with women who had not attended when invited for a cervical smear. There was no significant difference in mammography uptake among the women on the lists of GPs with differing views or whose doctors differed in their degree of active commitment to the programme. The results point to a need for the screening unit to evaluate its own advocacy role to GPs and for Health Board to devise effective appraisal strategies for health promotion clinics in primary care.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Kee. 1992. Do general practitioners facilitate the breast screening programme?. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008469-199204000-00004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Sexual abuse of children: the necessity of medical intervention].

Recently the Dutch Health Council published a report on the medical aspects of sexual abuse of children. The questions underlying this report reflect an attempt to arrive at hard indices of sexual abuse in children through the assessment of physical symptoms. For the medical assessment, the authors refer to the Dutch translation of an English report entitled Physical signs of sexual abuse in children, published by The Royal College of Physicians. The hazards connected with the exclusive focus on physical symptoms are recognized, and the authors stress that medical examination should be part of a much broader assessment of the child and his/her family. However, instead of confining themselves to assessment issues of physical symptoms, the authors add a rather meagre account of behavioural and emotional factors relevant to the diagnosis of sexual abuse of children. Unfortunately, this approach seems to aggravate the problems underlying misdiagnosis rather than to increase diagnostic accuracy and improve adequate care for sexually abused children.

Attitude of Health Personnel