PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14679358

Antiphospholipid syndrome.

Abstract

Antiphospholipid syndrome has received considerable attention from the medical community because of its association with a number of serious clinical disorders, including arterial and venous thromboembolism, acute ischemic encephalopathy, recurrent pregnancy loss, thrombocytopenia, and livido reticularis. It can occur within the context of several diseases, mainly autoimmune disorders, and is then called secondary antiphospholipid syndrome. However, it may be also be present without any recognizable disease, or so-called primary antiphospholipid syndrome. There is no defined racial predominance for primary antiphospholipid syndrome, although a higher prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) occurs in African Americans and the Hispanic population. Multiple terms exist for this syndrome, some of which can be confusing. Lupus anticoagulant syndrome, for example, is a misleading term, because patients may not necessarily have SLE, and it is associated with thrombotic rather than hemorrhagic complications. To avoid further confusion, antiphospholipid syndrome is currently the preferred term for this clinical syndrome. Antiphospholipid antibodies are found in 1% to 5% of young healthy control subjects; however, the incidence increases with age and coexistent chronic disease. The syndrome occurs most commonly in young to middle-aged adults; however, it also can occur in children and the elderly. Among patients with SLE, the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies is high, ranging from 12% to 30% for anticardiolipin antibodies, and 15% to 34% for lupus anticoagulant antibodies. In general, anticardiolipin antibodies occur approximately five times more often then lupus anticoagulant in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. This syndrome is the most common cause of acquired thrombophilia, associated with either venous or arterial thrombosis or both. It is characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis, and spontaneous abortion. Rarely, patients with antiphospholipid syndrome may have fulminate multiple organ failure, or catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. This is caused by widespread microthrombi in multiple vascular beds, and can be devastating. Patients with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome may have massive venous thromboembolism, along with respiratory failure, stroke, abnormal liver enzyme concentrations, renal impairment, adrenal insufficiency, and areas of cutaneous infarction. According to the international consensus statement, at least one clinical criterion (vascular thrombosis, pregnancy complications) and one laboratory criterion (lupus anticoagulant, antipcardiolipin antibodies) should be present for a diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome. The hallmark result from laboratory tests that defines antiphospholipid syndrome is the presence of antibodies or abnormalities in phospholipid-dependent tests of coagulation, such as dilute Russell viper venom time. There is no consensus for treatment among physicians. Overall, there is general agreement that patients with recurrent thrombotic episodes require life-long anticoagulation therapy and that those with recurrent spontaneous abortion require anticoagulation therapy and low- dose aspirin therapy during most of gestation. Prophylactic anticoagulation therapy is not justified in patients with high titer anticardiolipin antibodies with no history of thrombosis. However, if a history of recurrent deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism is established, long-term anticoagulant therapy with international normalized ratio (INR) of approximately 3 is needed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sefer Gezer. 2003. Antiphospholipid syndrome.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disamonth.2003.10.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evaluation of a new silica clotting time in the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants.

INTRODUCTION: A new commercial silica clotting time (SCT), the HemosIL SCT assay (Instrumentation Laboratory, Milan, Italy) was evaluated in the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants (LAC). This integrated test system for screening and confirmation was compared with the frequently used aPTT-based PTT-LA and Staclot-LA (Diagnostica Stago, Asnières, France) in a patient population investigated for LAC and in a subpopulation who met the clinical criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 201 samples were analysed with the HemosIL SCT assay. Own reference values were calculated. Results are expressed as measured clotting times in seconds or as normalised ratios. RESULTS: SCT screen and PTT-LA had a sensitivity of, 61.1% and 63.8%, respectively. Normalising the results gained sensitivity up to 72.2% and 90%, respectively. The confirmation SCT and the Staclot-LA had a sensitivity of 30.6% and 63.9% with a specificity of 86.7% and 100%, respectively. Sensitivity of SCT for detecting LAC in clinical criteria positive patients was lower compared to aPTT and dRVVT (45.8% versus 66.7% and 65%). Combination of SCT/dRVVT and aPTT/dRVVT gave a sensitivity of 51.2% and 63.6%, with a specificity of 50.0% and 52.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with PTT-LA as screening test, the SCT screen shows an acceptable sensitivity. However, the HemosIL SCT assay including the confirmation step, has a much lower sensitivity in the diagnosis of LAC in comparison with the Staclot-LA test. Combining the HemosIL SCT assay with dRVVT results in a better sensitivity, although lower than the combined aPTT/dRVVT based method as usually performed in our lab.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome↗

Bilateral medial cerebellar infarction in a patient positive for lupus anticoagulant.

Bilateral medial cerebellar infarction occurring simultaneously is rare. We describe a middle aged male with bilateral cerebellar infarction complicated by subsequent left superior cerebellar artery infarction. Lupus anticoagulant was positive. Though the prognosis is usually considered good, our patient made poor recovery.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome↗