PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14686756

Hypertensive brainstem encephalopathy.

Abstract

A 45-year-old man developed severe arterial hypertension associated with unusual hyperintensity in the brainstem, around the right internal capsule and in the deep white matter around the bilateral anterior horn of the lateral ventricle on T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery images. The characteristic clinical findings were mild left hepiparesis and altered mental status which corresponded to the lesions of MR imagings. The lesions improved gradually with improvements in hypertension, which suggested that edema could be the principal cause of the unusual hyperintensity on MR images.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuzuru Yasuda, Ichiro Akiguchi, Tadahiko Imai, Masanobu Sonobe, Makoto Kage. 2003. Hypertensive brainstem encephalopathy.. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.42.1131

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients.

Using MRI techniques, we show here that normalization of tumor vessels in recurrent glioblastoma patients by daily administration of AZD2171-an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF receptors-has rapid onset, is prolonged but reversible, and has the significant clinical benefit of alleviating edema. Reversal of normalization began by 28 days, though some features persisted for as long as four months. Basic FGF, SDF1alpha, and viable circulating endothelial cells (CECs) increased when tumors escaped treatment, and circulating progenitor cells (CPCs) increased when tumors progressed after drug interruption. Our study provides insight into different mechanisms of action of this class of drugs in recurrent glioblastoma patients and suggests that the timing of combination therapy may be critical for optimizing activity against this tumor.

Brain Edema↗

Third-trimester fetal MRI in isolated 10- to 12-mm ventriculomegaly: is it worth it?

OBJECTIVE: The justification for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in isolated mild ventriculomegaly remains controversial. This study was undertaken to evaluate the contribution of third-trimester MRI in isolated 10- to 12-mm fetal ventriculomegaly. DESIGN: Observational prospective cohort study. SETTING: Universitary prenatal reference centre. POPULATION: From February 2000 to May 2005, we prospectively collected data concerning fetuses referred to us for cerebral MRI following detection of ventriculomegaly by ultrasound scan (n= 310). METHODS: Among these, we identified and analysed those cases in which ventriculomegaly was isolated and did not exceed 12 mm in ultrasound examinations prior to MRI scan (n= 185). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cases in which MRI provided additional information that was likely to have an impact on prenatal management were detailed. RESULTS: During the study period, 310 MRI were performed because of fetal ventriculomegaly. Hundred and eighty-five were suspected to be isolated 10- to 12-mm ventriculomegalies in ultrasound scan and formed our database. MRI confirmed the 10- to 12-mm isolated fetal ventriculomegaly in 106 cases (57.3%) and found other abnormalities in 5 (4.7%) of these 106 cases. MRI found ventricular measurement to be less than 10 mm in 43 cases (23.3%) and more than 12 mm in 36 cases (19.4%). Among these 36 fetuses with ventricle size more than 12 mm, 6 (16.7%) had other abnormalities, whereas MRI did not find other abnormalities in the 43 cases with ventricle size below 10 mm. CONCLUSION: Before advantages of MRI to ultrasound examination can be demonstrated, it seems reasonable that MRI should remain an investigational tool, restricted to selected clinical situations in which the results are expected to modify case management. Where ultrasound scan suspects isolated ventriculomegaly of 10 to 12 mm, our data suggest that when the finding is confirmed with MRI this could be expected in around 5% of cases. Therefore, the policy of routine MRI in such cases should depend on prenatal centres' priorities.

Brain Edema↗