PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 14712100

Combined procedures in laparoscopic surgery.

Atul Wadhwa·Pradeep K Chowbey·Anil Sharma·Rajesh Khullar·Vandana Soni·Manish Baijal
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

With advancements in minimal access surgery, combined laparoscopic procedures are now being performed for treating coexisting abdominal pathologies at the same surgery. In our center, we performed 145 combined surgical procedures from January 1999 to December 2002. Of the 145 procedures, 130 were combined laparoscopic/endoscopic procedures and 15 were open procedures combined with endoscopic procedures. The combination included laparoscopic cholecystectomy, various hernia repairs, and gynecological procedures like hysterectomy, salpingectomy, ovarian cystectomy, tubal ligation, urological procedures, fundoplication, splenectomy, hemicolectomy, and cystogastrostomy. In the same period, 40 patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 40 patients who had undergone ventral hernia repair were randomly selected for comparison of intraoperative outcomes with a combined procedure group. All the combined surgical procedures were performed successfully. The most common procedure was laparoscopic cholecystectomy with another endoscopic procedure in 129 patients. The mean operative time was 100 minutes (range 30-280 minutes). The longest time was taken for the patient who had undergone laparoscopic splenectomy with renal transplant (280 minutes). The mean hospital stay was 3.2 days (range 1-21 days). The pain experienced in the postoperative period measured on the visual analogue scale ranged from 2 to 5 with a mean of 3.1. Of 145 patients who underwent combined surgical procedures, 5 patients developed fever in the immediate postoperative period, 7 patients had port site hematoma, 5 patients developed wound sepsis, and 10 patients had urinary retention. As long as the basic surgical principles and indications for combined procedures are adhered to, more patients with concomitant pathologies can enjoy the benefit of minimal access surgery. Minimal access surgery is feasible and appears to have several advantages in simultaneous management of two different coexisting pathologies without significant addition in postoperative morbidity and hospital stay.

Explore related subjects

EndoscopyFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleRetrospective StudiesSurgical Procedures, OperativeJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Atul Wadhwa, Pradeep K Chowbey, Anil Sharma, Rajesh Khullar, Vandana Soni, Manish Baijal. 2003. Combined procedures in laparoscopic surgery.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129689-200312000-00007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Training with simulation improves residents' endovascular procedure skills.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular procedure simulators are now commercially available and in use for physician training. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of simulation-based training in vascular surgery residencies. METHODS: Residents from vascular surgery programs in a five-state area were invited to participate in a series of 2-day endovascular training programs that used a high-fidelity endovascular procedure simulator (SimSuite; Medical Simulation Corporation, Denver, Colo), didactic instruction, computer-based training, and tabletop procedure demonstrations. The curriculum covered arteriography and intervention for treatment of aortoiliac, renal, and carotid artery disease. Nine residents participated, with one to three per training session. Each completed an average of 9.5 simulated endovascular cases. Performance on a standardized TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus B iliac angioplasty/stenting case was used to assess endovascular skills and knowledge at the beginning of the training program, and this was repeated at the completion of the training. Performance metrics were measured by the simulator, faculty observed trainees' performance of simulated cases, and trainees provided their evaluations of the usefulness of the simulation experiences. RESULTS: Endovascular procedural skills on the standardized iliac intervention case improved after completion of the training program. Compared with performance early on day 1, performance improved (P < or = .05; paired t test): total procedure time decreased 54%, volume of contrast decreased 44%, and fluoroscopy time decreased 48% (mean change from baseline). Selection of angioplasty balloon catheters and stents was improved, and the average number of catheters used and stents deployed decreased, although this did not reach statistical significance. Faculty observation allowed identification of shortcomings of knowledge and skills, including common problems with selection of catheter, balloon, and stent sizes; correct positioning of the sheath; and intraprocedural monitoring. Postcourse evaluations indicated support for the use of simulation in vascular surgery residents' endovascular training. CONCLUSIONS: Training with a simulator, incorporated into an individual or small group learning session, offers a means to learn and realistically practice endovascular procedures without direct risk to patients, with measurable improvements in key performance metrics. How simulation training affects subsequent clinical performance has yet to be established.

Endoscopy↗
PubMed2007

Intraoperative surgical navigation for endoscopic sinus surgery: rationale and indications.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review discusses the rationale and indications for image-guided surgery through a critical discussion of registration concepts as well as clinical reports. RECENT FINDINGS: The surgical navigation accuracy achieved by commercially available image-guided surgery systems is best reported as target registration error. Clinically achievable target registration error is probably in the 1.5-2.0 mm range. Dry lab studies of registration serve to highlight the principles of registration, the process through which image-guided surgery systems calculate the one-to-one mapping relationship between the preoperative imaging data and the intraoperative surgical volume. Reports on image-guided surgery have highlighted its usefulness in primary and revision endoscopic sinus surgery, osteoplastic frontal sinusotomy, transsphenoidal hypophysectomy, endoscopic cerebrospinal fluid leak repair and endoscopic pterygomaxillary fossa biopsy. Both three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and computed tomography-magnetic resonance fusion images have been incorporated into IGS for advanced minimally invasive endoscopic skull base procedures. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery policy statement accurately summarizes the current consensus for image-guided surgery applications. SUMMARY: Image-guided surgery has emerged as an important technology, which both general otolaryngologists and subspecialty rhinologists can employ for a wide variety of procedures.

Endoscopy↗