PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 14722921

Context of deletions and insertions in human coding sequences.

Alexey S Kondrashov·Igor B Rogozin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We studied the dependence of the rate of short deletions and insertions on their contexts using the data on mutations within coding exons at 19 human loci that cause mendelian diseases. We confirm that periodic sequences consisting of three to five or more nucleotides are mutagenic. Mutability of sequences with strongly biased nucleotide composition is also elevated, even when mutations within homonucleotide runs longer than three nucleotides are ignored. In contrast, no elevated mutation rates have been detected for imperfect direct or inverted repeats. Among known candidate contexts, the indel context GTAAGT and regions with purine-pyrimidine imbalance between the two DNA strands are mutagenic in our sample, and many others are not mutagenic. Data on mutation hot spots suggest two novel contexts that increase the deletion rate. Comprehensive analysis of mutability of all possible contexts of lengths four, six, and eight indicates a substantially elevated deletion rate within YYYTG and similar sequences, which is one of the two contexts revealed by the hot spots. Possible contexts that increase the insertion rate (AT(A/C)(A/C)GCC and TACCRC) and decrease deletion (TATCGC) or insertion (GCGG) rates have also been identified. Two-thirds of deletions remove a repeat, and over 80% of insertions create a repeat, i.e., they are duplications.

Explore related subjects

Chromosome DeletionDatabases, GeneticGenetic MarkersHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsMutagenesis, InsertionalRecombination, GeneticRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidTerminal Repeat SequencesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alexey S Kondrashov, Igor B Rogozin. 2004. Context of deletions and insertions in human coding sequences.. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.10312

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Prevalence of duplications and deletions of the 22q11 DiGeorge syndrome region in a population-based sample of infants with cleft palate.

The prevalence of duplications and deletions of the 22q11.2 (DiGeorge syndrome) region was studied among babies born in Norway with open cleft palate without cleft lip (cleft palate only, CPO). During a 5-year period (1996-2001), there were 245 live births with CPO that were referred for surgery. DNA was available from 174 cases with overt cleft palate. DNA copy number was analyzed with the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique, and an unambiguous result was obtained in 169 (97%) of the samples. We found no 22q11.2 duplications, and one known, and two previously undiagnosed cases with 22q11.2 deletions. All three del22q11-syndrome cases also had heart malformations, which represent one-third of the 10 babies with heart malformations in our study population. The prevalence of del22q11-syndrome among babies with cleft palate with or without additional malformations was 1 of 57 (1.8%). Because the prevalence of CPO in the 35 22q11.2 duplication cases published was 20%, we also investigated if dup22q11-testing was warranted in this group. However, no 22q11.2 duplications were found, indicating that the duplication cases ascertained so far might not be representative of the dup22q11-group as a whole. We conclude that neither del22q11 nor dup22q11 testing is warranted in babies with overt cleft palate as the only finding.

Chromosome Deletion↗
PubMed2007

A physical analysis of the Y chromosome shows no additional deletions, other than Gr/Gr, associated with testicular germ cell tumour.

Testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) is the most common malignancy in men aged 15-45 years. A small deletion on the Y chromosome known as 'gr/gr' was shown to be associated with a two-fold increased risk of TGCT, increasing to three-fold in cases with a family history of TGCT. Additional deletions of the Y chromosome, known as AZFa, AZFb and AZFc, are described in patients with infertility; however, complete deletions of these regions have not been identified in TGCT patients. We screened the Y chromosome in a series of TGCT cases to evaluate if additional deletions of Y were implicated in TGCT susceptibility. Single copy Y chromosome STS markers with an average inter-marker spacing of 128 kb were examined in constitutional DNA of 271 index TGCT patients. Three markers showed evidence of deletions, sY1291, indicative of 'gr/gr' (eight out of 271; 2.9%), Y-DAZ3 contained within 'gr/gr' (21 out of 271; 7.7%) and a single deletion of the marker G66152 was identified in one TGCT case. No other markers demonstrated deletions. While several regions of the Y chromosome are known to be deleted and associated with infertility, our study provides no evidence to suggest regions of Y deletion, other than 'gr/gr', are associated with susceptibility to TGCT in UK patients.

Chromosome Deletion↗
PubMed2007

Chromosomal deletions in bladder cancer: shutting down pathways.

Bladder cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world, leading to approximately 145,000 deaths annually. Bladder cancer is typically managed by surgical removal of the tumor; however, the recurrence rate is disappointingly very high, often requiring systemic chemotherapy. Improvement in the diagnosis and prognosis of bladder cancer will only come from a comprehensive understanding of the genetic factors that lead to its development. In this review, we focus on the chromosomal deletions that contribute to the downregulation of tumor suppressor pathways in bladder cancer. Chromosomal deletions are not a random event, since bladder cancer progression has been associated with specific chromosomal deletions and this progression correlates with specific stages of tumor development. The most commonly found chromosomal deletion in all stages of bladder cancer involves deletions in chromosome 9, resulting in the loss of three genes encoding proteins that activate the Rb and p53 tumor suppressors. Additionally, chromosome 9 harbors the TSC1 tumor suppressor which downregulates the well-known anti-apoptotic Akt/mTOR pathway. Hence, deletions on one chromosome may have a crucial influence on the initial steps in tumor development. Other deletions targeting the tumor suppressors Rb, p53, FHIT and LZTS1 occur at later stages of tumor development. Considering the central importance of these tumor suppressor pathways in the formation and evolution of tumors, the time has come to evaluate available drugs in bladder cancer that target the positive regulators of these pathways.

Chromosome Deletion↗