PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14728501

Using contextual queries.

Abstract

Search engines generally treat search requests in isolation. The results for a given query are identical, independent of the user, or the context in which the user made the request. An approach is demonstrated that explores implicit contexts as obtained from a document the user is reading. The approach inserts into an original (web) document functionality to directly activate context driven queries that yield related articles obtained from various information sources.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bob Schijvenaars, Erik Van Mulligen, Mario Diwersy, Marc Weeber, Christian Van Der Eijk, Rob Jelier, Jan Kors, Barend Mons. 2003. Using contextual queries.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14728501/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Frequency estimates from prescription drug datasets (revision of #04-11-066A).

PURPOSE: Accurate information about the number of times a drug is prescribed or dispensed annually is important to marketers, pharmacoepidemiologists, and patient safety researchers. Yet there is no standard reference for prescribing frequency data. The multiple sources that do exist vary in their sampling methods, target populations, nomenclature, and methods of tallying individual medications prescribed or dispensed. These differences are likely to create ambiguity and contradictions in the scientific literature, but they are not well understood. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study to examine the similarities and differences between five well-known sources of prescribing frequency data: the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS, emergency department and outpatient department), the IMS National Prescription Drug Audit, the Solucient outpatient dataset, and the Solucient inpatient dataset. We compared survey methods, costs, overall frequencies, number of unique names in each database, correlations between frequency estimates from different databases, the extent of overlap in the databases, and nomenclature differences between and within datasets. RESULTS: All the correlations between frequency estimates derived from different datasets were significant, but the frequency estimates differed considerably. The lowest correlation (0.17) was found between the IMS and emergency department of the NHAMCS, and the highest correlation (0.93) was between IMS and Solucient outpatient data. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were significant correlations between frequency estimates for comparable datasets, sampling methods and nomenclature choices resulted in important differences both for individual drug products and for overall frequency statistics. Researchers need to be aware of the differences when deriving drug frequency with these datasets.

Databases as Topic↗

Towards the creation of an international toxicology information centre.

A pilot toxicology database system has been created which is accessible on-line via the world-wide web or in-house via an intranet. It is intended to be suitable as a source of toxicological information and to support structure-activity relationship studies, and it can be searched on chemical structural and substructural as well as toxicological and physico-chemical data. Successful completion of the pilot has led to an ongoing project to develop and expand the system.

Databases as Topic↗

US graduate medical education, 2004-2005: trends in primary care specialties.

CONTEXT: Over the last decade, the primary care specialties have experienced an ebb and flow in popularity. A description of the future primary care workforce may inform planning for the health care needs of our population. OBJECTIVES: To describe characteristics of physicians training in primary care specialties over the past 9 years and to monitor trends in the characteristics of the entire residency population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Descriptive survey study of the National GME Census, conducted by the American Medical Association and Association of American Medical Colleges, which jointly surveyed 8246 allopathic graduate medical education (GME) programs during the academic year 2004-2005 about active, transferred, and graduated residents, as well as about program characteristics. Program directors confirmed the status of 97.3% of active residents. The accompanying program survey was completed by 7163 (87%) of the program directors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: General trends in the numbers and characteristics of all residents, fellows, and training programs, with specific trends for residents and fellows training in the primary care specialties and subspecialties over the past 9 years. RESULTS: The census counted 101 291 physicians-in-training during the 2004-2005 academic year, the largest number ever recorded by this survey. The number of osteopathic medical school graduates (DOs) in allopathic GME decreased from 5838 in 2003-2004 to 5675, following many years of annual increases. The number of residents in primary care specialties reached a peak in the mid 1990s. The number of family medicine residents who are graduates of US allopathic medical schools (USMDs) has fallen from 8232 (77.6%) in 1998-1999 to 4848 (51.7%) in 2004-2005. The number of primary care residents who are graduates of foreign medical schools and US citizens (USIMGs) nearly doubled between 1995-1996 (n = 1768) and 2004-2005 (n = 3304). The number of USIMGs training in internal medicine or pediatrics subspecialties increased by 45.7% between 1995-1996 (n = 622) and 2004-2005 (n = 906). The number of pediatric subspecialty fellows grew 55.7%, mostly because of the near doubling of USMDs, from 813 to 1617. More than half of primary care residents are women (52.5%). All primary care specialties and subspecialties experienced gains in the proportion of female residents, with the greatest in obstetrics/gynecology, which increased by 28.7% (57.9% in 1995-1996 vs 74.5% in 2004-2005). CONCLUSIONS: An increasing proportion of physicians are pursuing subspecialty training, while the number in primary care specialties has leveled off. Trends in GME suggest that the primary care medical workforce of the future will include more women, more IMGs, and more DOs.

Databases as Topic↗