A Delphi study to identify performance indicators for emergency medicine.

E Beattie; K Mackway-Jones

doi:10.1136/emj.2003.001123

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 14734375

A Delphi study to identify performance indicators for emergency medicine.

E Beattie·K Mackway-Jones

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify performance indicators thought to reflect the quality of patient care in the emergency department. METHODS: A three round accelerated Expert Delphi study was conducted by email or fax. A panel of 33 experts drawn from the fields of emergency medicine, emergency nursing, professional service users, and patients were consulted. Participants were initially asked to propose performance indicators that reflected the quality of care given in the emergency department setting in the United Kingdom. In the second round these proposals were collated and scored using a 9 point Likert scale; those that had not reached consensus were returned for reconsideration in the light of group opinion. Those statements reaching a pre-defined consensus were identified. RESULTS: 224 performance indicators were proposed. Altogether 36 indicators reached consensus reflecting good departmental performance after round three; 24 of these were process measures. CONCLUSIONS: 36 potential indicators of good quality of care in the emergency department in the UK have been identified.

Explore related subjects

Delphi Technique Emergency Medical Services Humans Quality of Health Care Consensus Statement Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

E Beattie, K Mackway-Jones. 2004. A Delphi study to identify performance indicators for emergency medicine.. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2003.001123

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2025

Results of a local modified Delphi consensus on use of plasma metagenomic next-generation sequencing.

Molecular tests without well-defined test performance characteristics are increasingly available for diagnosis of infectious diseases. These tests present a diagnostic stewardship challenge for institutions. We share the results of a local modified Delphi consensus undertaken to define appropriate scenarios for use of plasma metagenomic next-generation sequencing.

Delphi Technique↗

PubMed2007

Can we achieve international agreement on terminologies and definitions used to describe abnormalities of menstrual bleeding?

BACKGROUND: There is considerable worldwide confusion in the use of terminologies and definitions around the symptom of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), and these are leading increasingly to difficulties in setting up multinational clinical trials and in interpreting the results of studies undertaken in single centres. An international initiative was established to develop an agreement process to recommend clear, simple terminologies and definitions with the potential for wide acceptance. METHODS: After widespread consultation with relevant international and national organizations, journal editors and individuals, a modified Delphi process was developed to assess the current use of terminologies followed by a structured face-to-face meeting of 35 clinicians (mostly gynaecologists) and scientists in Washington. Focused small group discussions led to plenary assessment of concepts and recommendations using an electronic keypad voting system. RESULTS: There was almost universal agreement that poorly defined terms of classical origin used in differing ways in the English medical language should be discarded and that these should be replaced by simple, descriptive terms with clear definitions which have the potential to be understood by health professional and patient alike and which can be translated into most languages. The major recommendations were to replace terms such as menorrhagia, metrorrhagia, hypermenorrhoea and dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Suggestions for potentially suitable replacement terms and definitions are made. CONCLUSIONS: A simple terminology has been recommended for the description and definition of symptoms and signs of AUB. This manuscript should be a living document and should be part of an ongoing process with international medical and community debate. Classification of causes, investigations and cultural and quality of life issues should be part of the ongoing process.

Delphi Technique↗

PubMed2006

Reporting data on homeopathic treatments (RedHot): a supplement to CONSORT*.

When homeopathy is tested in clinical trials, understanding and appraisal are likely to be improved if published reports contain details of prescribing strategies and treatments. An international Delphi panel was convened to develop consensus guidelines for reporting homeopathic methods and treatments. The panel agreed 28 treatment- and provider-specific items that supplement the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement items 2, 3, 4 and 19. The authors recommend these for adoption by authors and journals when reporting trials of homeopathy.

Delphi Technique↗