PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14749956

Vertebral infection.

Abstract

Vertebral infection represents 2-4% of all cases of osteomyelitis. An increase in the incidence of pyogenic as well as granulomatous spondylitis has been noticed. Early radiological diagnosis is of great importance for prompt treatment and prevention of clinically significant consequences which include neural compromise and late spinal deformities. The most frequent causative pyogenic micro-organisms are gram-negative bacteria especially Staphylococcus aureus. An important form of nonpyogenic granulomatous infection is tuberculous spondylitis which represents the most common form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. The routes of spinal infection include hematogenous spread, postoperative infections, direct implantation during spinal punctures and spread from a contiguous focus. The role of imaging is an early diagnosis, evaluation of extent of infection with special regard to potential neural compromise, differential diagnosis, guidance of diagnostic biopsy, planning of eventual operative procedures and assessment of therapeutic response. Imaging modalities include bone scintigraphy, radiography, CT and MRI. In practice, usually a combination of a sensitive and a specific method is utilised. The only imaging modality which combines high sensitivity with satisfactory specificity is MRI. This is the reason that MRI frequently has become the first imaging modality in clinically suspect spinal infection. The MRI is the method of choice for direct demonstration of extension of infection, especially of eventual epidural abscess or phlegmon and consecutive neural compression. Using MRI monitoring of therapeutic efficiency is possible.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Vladimir Jevtic. 2004. Vertebral infection.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2046-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗