PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 14750582

WHO disability grading: operational definitions.

J Wim Brandsma·Wim H Van Brakel
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The WHO disability grading has been in use for many years. Its main use has been as an indicator for early case detection/reporting. More recently, the WHO grading has also been used as a change indicator of impairments for patients while on treatment. In such instances, the individual scores for eyes hand, and feet are added to obtain the so-called EHF sum score. A major drawback in the use of the grading system has been the lack of operational definitions of the descriptions for the grades. This may result in data and results of comparisons of data across programs and countries being flawed. The paper discusses the WHO grading in the light of its dual use: as an indicator for early case detection and as an indicator for change in impairments. The paper presents operational definitions for the grading options.

Explore related subjects

Disability EvaluationFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansLeprosyMaleSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexWorld Health OrganizationJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Wim Brandsma, Wim H Van Brakel. 2003. WHO disability grading: operational definitions.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14750582/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Methods of evaluation of musician's dystonia: critique of measurement tools.

Musician's dystonia is associated with significant morbidity. To assess treatment options, accurate and precise measurements of disease severity are critical. We describe current methods of quantitatively measuring musician's dystonia of the upper extremity including subjective, objective, and automated methods. The degree to which these methods satisfy rigorous measurement criteria, including their reliability, validity, responsiveness to treatment, and practicality, is examined. We report that most of these methods have not been properly evaluated. Therefore, treatment trials based on these methods are difficult to interpret.

Disability Evaluation↗
PubMed2007

[Compensation for tinnitus in private accident insurance].

According to the provisions of private accident insurance, mental or psychic reactions are excluded from compensation. Until now, tinnitus was taken as fully psychic and therefore excluded. In two recently published judgments of the Federal Supreme Court in Germany the assessment of tinnitus in private accident insurance and particularly the exclusion clause section sign 2 Abs. 4 AUB 88 has been newly defined. According to this actual jurisdiction the compensation of tinnitus could be possible, when as physical underlying reason a proved harm in the inner ear or the auditory pathway (hearing loss), which can be traced back to the accident according to the rules of causality. This leads to the question how Tinnitus could be compensated without modification of the general terms and conditions of the private accident insurance. A compensating table is proposed, which recognizes the somatic (physical) part of tinnitus and is based on medical and scientific findings of the relation between hearing loss and tinnitus.

Disability Evaluation↗