PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14757712

Evaluating evidence on environmental health risks.

Abstract

The assessment of adverse health effects from environmental hazards involves integration of evidence from a variety of sources, including experimental studies, both in animals and humans, in vitro studies, and epidemiological research. It requires an understanding of the sources, nature and levels of exposure to which humans may be subjected, the nature of the health outcome or toxic effect and the mechanisms by which this might occur, the relationship between dose and response, and a knowledge of the variability and susceptibility of potentially exposed populations. After outlining the process of risk assessment, this paper gives an overview of the most relevant human study methods used to investigate environment and health effects and discusses issues such as confounding and effect modification, that are important to consider when interpreting the results from such studies. Future challenges are outlined, such as increasing responsibility required by scientists to the sensitive issue of data protection and confidentiality, and also new opportunities, such as the increasing availability of computerized data, the incorporation of molecular epidemiological methods to aid the investigation of mechanistic pathways and gene-environment interactions, and the development and utilization of sophisticated statistical approaches.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lesley Rushton, Paul Elliott. 2003. Evaluating evidence on environmental health risks.. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb%2Fldg020

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Natural radioactivity intake into wheat grown on fertilized farms in two districts of Pakistan.

The use of phosphate fertilizers on agricultural farms enhances gamma-ray activity concentration in the farms and therefore absorbed dose rates to the public. The most common natural radionuclides in fertilizer and soil are (40)K, (226)Ra and (232)Th. Agricultural farms at four locations in two districts in Pakistan consisting of saline and normal soils had been under fertilizer treatment for the past 30, 20, 10 and 0 y, therefore, natural radioactivity has been measured in soil samples from these sites to investigate the effect of fertilizers in soil and wheat grown in these sites. Radioactivity measured in soil of the sites under investigation was 550-644, 20-35 and 42-58 Bq kg(-1) for (40)K, (226)Ra and (232)Th, respectively. Wheat was grown in the farms and radioactivity transferred from soil to roots, shoots and grains was also measured. Relatively high natural radioactivity has been observed in the fertilized agricultural farms and in the wheat plants grown in these farms. From the total amount of an element uptaken in a plant, distribution of the element in different parts of the plant has been studied. The distribution of potassium was almost uniform in roots, shoots and grains of wheat; that of radium was different in the three parts of wheat; and that of thorium was almost equal in shoots and grains but quite large in the roots. Soils to grain transfer factors of the natural radionuclides have been determined as 3-4 x 10(-2) for (226)Ra, 2-3 x 10(-2) for (232)Th and 17-20 x 10(-2) for (40)K. Annual doses of (40)K and (226)Ra received by intake of grain products have been estimated to lie within range while the dose received from intake of (232)Th is larger than the range specified in UNSCEAR report 2000.

Environmental Exposure↗