PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14760957

Peer support groups in multiple sclerosis: current effectiveness and future directions.

Abstract

Peer support programs have become a common method of providing support for patients with chronic illness. Utilizing peers as resources has been proposed as an effective means for coping with a stressful life experience and for gaining support from others who share a common factor, although data are somewhat mixed on the efficacy of peer support. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of eight weeks of a standard form of peer support in improving quality of life and reducing depressive symptoms in 44 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). One person from each of six groups participated in a training course in order to learn basic principles of peer support. Eight weekly sessions were held and patients completed self-administered questionnaires pre- and post-treatment assessing quality of life and depression. Results showed that support groups do not provide consistent improvement in quality of life or depression in patients with MS and suggest that patients who have better mental health functioning could be at risk for deterioration in support groups.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Messmer Uccelli, L Mancuso Mohr, M A Battaglia, P Zagami, D C Mohr. 2004. Peer support groups in multiple sclerosis: current effectiveness and future directions.. https://doi.org/10.1191/1352458504ms973oa

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Depression in primary care: learning lessons in a national quality improvement program.

In this introduction, we describe the overall context and rationale for the Depression in Primary Care program and the design and implementation of its key components, especially emphasizing its unique combined clinical and economic/systems framework. We also discuss some of the new challenges and opportunities that may impact the program's evolution and the state of behavioral health care more generally. We conclude with some thoughts on potential future scenarios and strategies for improving the quality of behavioral health care, including the treatment of depression in primary care.

Depression↗

Commentary: an economic perspective on implementing evidence-based depression care.

Despite the development of cost-effective evidence-based models for treating depression in primary care, economic and organizational barriers often impede sustainability in routine clinical practice. Under the Depression in Primary Care: Linking Clinical and System Strategies program, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) funded eight demonstration grants to implement clinical changes in depression care alongside changes in contractual relationships, payment methods and other economic arrangements. The preceding articles summarize the specific economic and organizational changes implemented under four of these demonstration projects. This commentary highlights certain elements that appear critical to successfully re-align system incentives to support evidence-based depression care based in part on the experiences of these four sites.

Depression↗