PubMed · 14814669
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1951. B.C.G.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14814669/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVES: In situations with vaccination coverage high enough to control pertussis, observational studies have reported divergent effects of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccination on childhood survival. We examined whether this could be because of methodological differences. METHODS: Some studies of the impact of DTP updated information on vaccination retrospectively (retrospective updating approach) while others kept vaccination status fixed for the time between follow-up visits (landmark approach). First, we conducted simulations with these approaches to investigate the impact of different mortality levels, vaccination incidence rates, intervals between data collection visits, and the proportion of children whose vaccination card had not been seen after death. Second, we re-analysed data from Guinea-Bissau using the retrospective updating approach. RESULTS: In simulations, the retrospective updating approach produced rate ratio (vaccinated/unvaccinated) estimates biased towards zero because of a differential misclassification which created survival bias as risk-free observation time was allocated to the vaccinated group. The landmark approach produced rate ratio estimates biased towards one. Biases increased with interval between data collection visits and incidence of vaccination, but were unaffected by the underlying mortality level. Survival bias increased with the proportion of dead children whose vaccination status could not be updated. The re-analysis of data from Guinea-Bissau changed the estimated impact of DTP from an 84% higher mortality using the landmark approach to a 37% lower mortality using the retrospective updating approach. CONCLUSIONS: The apparent contradiction between DTP studies could be because of methodological differences. To assess child survival associated with routine vaccinations, studies minimizing the effect of biases are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Observational studies of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine from longitudinal study sites have reported divergent effects on child survival, ranging from 10-fold reduction to threefold increased mortality. None of these studies had complete information on DTP vaccinations from both survivors and children who died. We reviewed the data analysis methodology to assess whether methodological differences could explain the divergent results. DESIGN: Studies have used case-control design, survival analysis with interval-fixed vaccination status (landmark approach), and survival analysis with retrospective updating of vaccination status. RESULTS: Seven studies using a case-control design or a landmark approach found a negative effect of DTP on child survival. Eight of nine survival analyses with retrospective updating of vaccination status reported a beneficial effect. This beneficial effect of DTP increased with the length of the interval between data collection visits. Studies with long interval between visits had very high mortality rates among unvaccinated children, low mortality rate ratios for vaccinated compared with unvaccinated children, and strongly beneficial estimates of DTP. CONCLUSION: The divergent results in observational studies of the impact of DTP on child survival are partly because of methodological differences. To assess the impact on mortality of routine vaccinations, observational study designs which minimize the effect of bias are warranted. Randomized trials should be considered.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.