PubMed · 14823112
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
F KLOPFER. 1951. [Acetabular protrusion].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14823112/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In pelvic and acetabular surgery intraoperative control of reduction and implant position is sometimes hard to achieve with conventional C-arm technology. The Siemens C-arm Iso-C(3D) imaging system enables axial cuts and two- or three-dimensional reconstructions to be generated. Following the good experience in surgery of the spine and extremities, its clinical applicability in pelvic surgery was evaluated in 30 patients in a prospective clinical trial. In all 20 patients with acetabular fractures reduction quality and implant position could be well assessed. In one postoperative examination an intraarticular screw placement was evident, which intraoperatively was not as clear and was revised. In one procedure an intraarticular fragment was visualized, and was extracted in the same procedure. In one procedure the use of the Iso-C(3D) system enabled the approach to be limited. In all ten pelvic ring injuries the osseous structures in the posterior pelvic ring could be visualized with an adequate image quality. Reduction quality and implant position could be assessed in all open and closed procedures. On two occasions the SI screws were navigated based upon the Iso-C(3D) dataset. Overall the use of the Iso-C(3D) system was successful in all cases. Image quality, which is clearly inferior to that of CT, was sufficient for the assessment of reduction quality and implant position. One revision was indicated, and one avoided. However, in spite of its advantages in pelvic surgery, handling, sterile covering and data transfer need to be improved. For bilateral pelvic injuries the image size is too small.
The acetabular labrum makes a vital contribution to the stability of the hip joint. Hip arthroscopy has revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of labral pathology. Lesions that would otherwise have gone unrecognised are now amenable to resection and in some cases repair. Symptomatic relief is generally good after treatment of traumatic tears but patients with co-existing articular cartilage degeneration do less well. The long-term results of arthroscopic surgery for the acetabular labrum are awaited.
Reduction of the range of motion (ROM) until prosthetic impingement of a total hip replacement may lead to frequent impingement, subluxation and dislocation especially for patients with good hip movement. The ROM until prosthetic impingement can be calculated using the technical ROM (theta) and the cup and neck positions by a previously created mathematical formula. A larger (theta) with proper cup and neck positions results in a larger ROM. However there was only one paper written in English, which revealed the optimum theoretical combination of cup and neck anteversions. ROM of more than 110 degrees flexion, 30 degrees internal-rotation at 90 degrees flexion, 30 degrees extension and 40 degrees external-rotation were defined as the criteria for essential ROM for ADL. The safe-zones for combined cup anteversion (betaanat) and neck anteversion (b) were defined as the areas that fulfill all the criteria of ROM without prosthetic impingement. The safe-zones were created for 35 degrees , 45 degrees and 55 degrees cup abductions (alpha) and for 120 degrees and 135 degrees (theta). The safe-zones for combined (betaanat) and (b) were much larger for a 135 degrees (theta) than a 120 degrees (theta). Their safe-zones showed that (b) should be reduced if (betaanat) is increased and choosing a lower (alpha) requires that the sum of (betaanat) and (b) should be higher and vice versa. A (theta) of more than 135 degrees is recommended as it further increases the size of the safe-zone and provides a larger ROM, and the optimum values of combined cup and neck anteversions can be estimated by the formula: (alpha) + (betaanat) + 0.77(b) = 84.3.