PubMed · 14913429
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
F D DODRILL. 1952. Double aortic arch.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14913429/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The failure of embryonic vascular arches to fuse and regress in the usual manner during the formation of the aortic arch, pulmonary arteries and ductus arteriosus can cause a wide spectrum of vascular congenital abnormalities of the aortic arch and its branches. These abnormal vascular structures may cause variable compression of the trachea and/or oesophagus with symptoms ranging from none to severe stridor, dyspnoea, dysphagia and cyanosis. Diagnosis and possible treatment of affected patients require multiple imaging modalities. In the majority of cases, the underlying malformation can be detected by chest radiography and barium oesophagography, visualizing the location of the aortic arch and the presence of anomalous compressions of the trachea and/or oesophagus. However, in most cases the exact configuration of the vascular abnormality cannot be fully defined with conventional radiology alone. MRI is fundamental for evaluation of the thoracic vessels. Not only is it non-invasive, but it can also provide large-field-of-view images in any number of planes with three-dimensional reconstruction, adding valuable information about exact vascular configuration, tracheobronchial compression and brachiocephalic vessel branching. The aim of this review is to describe the imaging findings in children affected with special emphasis on MRI.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Ascending aortic blood pressure-derived indices were shown to be related to coronary atherosclerosis. Unfortunately, most studies published so far included patients with preserved left ventricular function. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the relation between ascending aortic blood pressure-derived indices and the extent of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with impaired left ventricular function. METHODS: The study group consisted of 375 patients (302 men and 73 women; mean age: 59.0+/-10.1 years) with angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease and ejection fraction < or =55%. Invasive ascending aortic blood pressure during catheterization and conventional sphygmomanometer measurements were taken. RESULTS: None of the brachial or aortic blood pressure-derived indices differed between patients with one-, two- and three-vessel coronary artery disease. They were not independently related to the risk of having three-vessel coronary artery disease in none of the constructed models in logistic regression analysis. Moreover, none of the studied indices was correlated with Gensini or severity scores. We also did not find any significant correlation between blood pressure-derived indices and extent of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with ejection fraction < or =25%, 25-40% or >40%. CONCLUSION: Ascending aortic blood pressure-derived indices are not correlated with the severity of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with coronary artery disease and impaired left ventricular function.