PubMed · 14920821
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M AGENO, R QUERZOLI. 1952. [Fluorescence caused by alpha particles in solution. II].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14920821/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
This work presents an experimental investigation of the measurement of the gross alpha-particle activity of water samples by EPA Method 900.0. The residue produced in Method 900.0 is modeled by a BaSO4 precipitate distributed over a planchet. The dependence of the gross alpha-particle activity on the activity of Ra and its progeny, on the residue mass and geometry, and on the time between sample preparation and analysis is studied. It is shown that these factors can cause the gross alpha-particle activity of a sample to vary by more than a factor of three for replicate samples and to significantly overestimate the alpha activity of the residue. For a given sample geometry, the gross-alpha particle activity generally increases as the residue mass increases owing to the presence of the radium progeny.
Experiments were designed and performed in order to investigate whether or not the different cellular energy deposition patterns of photon radiation with different energies (29 kV, 220 kV X rays; Co-60, Cs-137-gamma-rays) and alpha-radiation from an Am-241 source differ in DNA damage induction capacity in human cells. For this purpose, the alkaline comet assay (single cell gel electrophoresis) was applied to measure the amount of DNA damage in relation to the dose received. The comet assay data for the parameters '% DNA in the tail' and 'tail moment' for human peripheral lymphocytes did not indicate any difference in the initial radiation damage produced by 29 kV X rays relative to the reference radiations, 220 kV X rays and the gamma rays, whether for the total mean dose range of 0-3 Gy nor in the low-dose range. In contrast, when the 'tail length' data were analysed saturation of the fitted dose response curve appeared for X rays at about 1.5 Gy but was not apparent for gamma rays up to 3 Gy. Preliminary data for alpha exposures of HSC45-M2 cells showed a significant increase in DNA damage only at high doses (>2 Gy Am-241), but the damage at 2 Gy exceeded the damage induced at 2 Gy by Cs-137-gamma-rays by a factor of 2.5. In contrast, other experiments involving different cell systems and DNA damage indicators such as chromosomal aberrations have detected a significant increase in DNA damage at much lower doses, that is at 0.02 Gy for Am-241 and depicte a higher biological effectiveness. These results indicate that differences in biological effects arise through downstream processing of complex DNA damage.
Radiation-induced bystander effect has been well documented. However, the mechanisms are poorly understood. How we incorporate this effect into the classical models of risk assessment remains an open question. Here, the induction of bystander effect was studied by assessing DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation in situ with the rapid and sensitive gamma-H2AX focus formation assay. Utilising the Columbia University single-cell microbeam system to deliver 2 or 20 individual alpha particles to selected cell nuclei in a precisely known proportion of cells in a population, the induced DNA DSB incidences were quantified 30 min and 18 h post-IR. The increase in DNA DSB incidence in bystander cells lacked of a linear dose response indicating that neither the dose of irradiation nor proportion of irradiated cells in a population, is a critical parameter. This study confirms a binary all-or-nothing model of triggering the bystander response. The delay and persistence of the bystander response suggests a different mechanism of DSB induction in bystander cells than in directly irradiated cells.