PubMed · 14942968
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
T J CANTY. 1952. Amputations and recent developments in artificial limbs.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14942968/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Reliability and validity of a new tool, Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA), were examined in patients with lower-extremity sarcoma. FMA requires the patients to physically perform the functional mobility measures, unlike patient self-report or clinician administered measures. PROCEDURE: A sample of 114 subjects participated, 20 healthy volunteers and 94 patients with lower-extremity sarcoma after amputation, limb-sparing, or rotationplasty surgery. Reliability of the FMA was examined by three raters testing 20 healthy volunteers and 23 subjects with lower-extremity sarcoma. Concurrent validity was examined using data from 94 subjects with lower-extremity sarcoma who completed the FMA, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS), Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2), and Toronto Extremity Salvage Scale (TESS) scores. Construct validity was measured by the ability of the FMA to discriminate between subjects with and without functional mobility deficits. RESULTS: FMA demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC [2,1] >or=0.97). Moderate correlations were found between FMA and SF-36v2 (r = 0.60, P < 0.01), FMA and MSTS (r = 0.68, P < 0.01), and FMA and TESS (r = 0.62, P < 0.01). The patients with lower-extremity sarcoma scored lower on the FMA as compared to healthy controls (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The FMA is a reliable and valid functional outcome measure for patients with lower-extremity sarcoma. This study supports the ability of the FMA to discriminate between patients with varying functional abilities and supports the need to include measures of objective functional mobility in examination of patients with lower-extremity sarcoma.
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of the implementation of the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot (ICDF) in the area of Pistoia (Tuscany, Italy), in terms of percentage of population screened, reduction of hospitalization, and reduction of lower extremity amputations. The study was carried out over a 5-year period (1999-2003) in a district general hospital covering a clearly defined and relatively static population. The implementation of ICDF was performed at district health care level, in collaboration with general practitioners, and at the hospital with the establishment of a multidisciplinary care team. The database for this study was extracted from the DRG Tuscany database, and the diabetes foot lesion data source was taken from the Data Elaboration Centre of the Health Care District of Pistoia, cross-checked with the clinical records of the Diabetes Unit. In the period of the study, there was an increase in both the total number of diabetic foot lesions observed and the number of patients with diabetes referred for evaluation to the Diabetes Unit of Pistoia. Following implementation, the total number of hospitalizations for diabetic foot lesions and the duration of clinical stay were reduced. The total incidence of amputations per 100,000 inhabitants decreased from 10.7 in 1999, to 10.1 in 2000, 2.7 in 2001, 6.3 in 2002 and 6.24 in 2003. In particular, while the incidence of major amputations decreased over time, the relative number of minor amputations increased in the first years, stabilizing at a higher rate in later years. Finally, while before 1999 most people from the Pistoia area were referred to various hospitals in Tuscany for diabetic foot problems, during the implementation period almost all were referred to the Diabetic Unit of Pistoia. This study shows the advantages of prospective data collection, demonstrating that the implementation of the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot can improve foot care in diabetes.
Past wartime experience and recent civilian reports indicate upper extremity (UE) vascular injury occurs less often and with less limb loss than lower extremity (LE) injury. Given advances in critical care, damage control techniques, and military armor technology, the objective of this evaluation was to define contemporary patterns of UE injury and effectiveness of vascular surgical management in UE vascular injury during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). From 1 September 2004 through 31 August 2005, 2,473 combat-related injuries were treated at the central echelon III surgical facility in Iraq. Patients with UE vascular injuries upon arrival were reviewed. Vessels injured were delineated. Therapeutic interventions, early limb viability, and complication rates following vascular repair were recorded. Of casualties treated during the study period, 43 (1.7%) UE and 83 (3.3%) LE vascular injuries were identified. Of the UE injuries, 11 (26%) had been operated on at forward locations and six (14%) had temporary shunts in place upon arrival at our facility. Injury levels included 10 (23%) subclavian-axillary, 25 (58%) brachial, and 10 (23%) distal to the brachial bifurcation. Two patients had multilevel injury. Twenty-eight grafts were placed, and 10 vessel repairs and eight ligations were performed. Two (4.7%) brachial interposition grafts required removal due to infection. Four (9.3%) subacute brachial graft thromboses occurred. Four (9.3%) patients underwent early UE amputation. In this most recent U.S. military evaluation of wartime UE vascular injury, UE injury appears rare, with LE injury twice as frequent. Yet, UE limb loss appears more substantial than noted previously. These findings are likely related to significant tissue destruction occurring with the combined mechanisms of injury sustained in OIF.