PubMed · 14948044
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C E NYLUND. 1952-06-13. [Electron rays].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14948044/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE: In breast radiotherapy, delivery of manually-calculated electron boosts limits retrospective dose-response analyses as dose distribution is unavailable. This work evaluates the feasibility of reconstructing dose distributions from manually planned electron boosts in breast-conserving radiotherapy. METHODS: Only 72 out of 198 breast cancer patients had complete stored dose distributions from sequential electron boosts in the REQUITE study. Arbitrary data from 70/72 patients were used to develop and validate dose reconstruction method. Twenty patients were used to determine optimal parameters for Monte-Carlo-based (MC) electron dose reconstruction on RayStation (v.11B-R), considering CT-calibration curve, MC-history number, andcalculation grid resolution. Remaining 50 patients were used to quantify dose reconstruction accuracy. The similarity between reconstructed and stored dose was evaluated using 3D-gamma index and dosimetric parameters extracted from breast and tumour bed contours. Dose difference location was evaluated using dose-location histogram. RESULTS: Calculation grid resolution significantly impacted electron dose distribution (p < 0.01), where the finest grid (0.15 cm) showed highest similarity to stored doses. CT-calibration curve and MC-history number had a negligible influence on dose reconstruction. Dosimetric difference between reconstructed and stored doses was < 1 Gy for breast and tumour bed. Reconstructed dose was achieved > 90% gamma passing rate in the validation set. However, around 2.5 Gy dose differences were observed at the skin and tissue interface regions. CONCLUSIONS: Retrospective electron boost dose reconstruction is feasible with acceptable accuracy, and could increase data completeness in large cohort studies. Caution is advised when assessing dose near tissue interface and further validation is needed outside the REQUITE dataset.
Electron capture dissociation (ECD) represents a significant advance in tandem mass spectrometry for the identification and characterization of post-translational modifications (PTMs) of polypeptides. In comparison with the conventional fragmentation techniques, such as collisionally induced dissociation and infrared multi-photon dissociation, ECD provides more extensive sequence fragments, while allowing the labile modifications to remain intact during backbone fragmentation. This unique attribute offers ECD as an attractive alternative for detection and localization of PTMs. The success and rapid adoption of ECD recently led to the culmination of The 1st International Uppsala Symposium on Electron Capture Dissociation of Biomolecules and Related Phenomena (October 19-22, 2003, Stockholm, Sweden). Herein, we present a general overview of the ECD technique as well as selected applications in characterization of post-translationally modified polypeptides.
Understanding the bonding in transition metal complexes with redox-active ligands is a major challenge, for example in redox catalysis or in bioinorganic chemistry. In this work, electronic g-tensors, spin-density distributions, and electronic structure have been studied by different density functional methods for an extended series of complexes [Ru(acac)2(L)]n (n = -1, 0, +1; L = redox-active o-quinonoid ligand). Comparison is made with experimental g-tensors and g-tensor-based oxidation-state assignments for a number of experimentally studied examples, using both gradient-corrected (BP86) and hybrid functionals (B3LYP, BHLYP) representing a range of exact-exchange admixtures. Reasonable, albeit not perfect, agreement with experimental g-tensors is obtained in one-component DFT calculations with hybrid functionals. Analyses of spin densities confirm the assignment of the cationic complexes as predominantly d5-Ru(III) with a neutral quinonoid ligand. However, this conclusion is obtained only after inclusion of the appreciable spin polarization of the unrestricted determinant, while the singly occupied molecular orbital (SOMO) is localized more on the acac ligands. The anionic complexes turn out to be approximately halfway between a d6-Ru(II)/semiquinone and a d5-Ru(III)/catecholate formulation, but again only after taking into account the extensive spin polarization. Even the previous assignment of the neutral parent systems as d5-Ru(III)/semiquinone is not accurate, as a d6-Ru(II)/quinone resonance structure contributes to some extent. Very unusual trends in the spin contamination of the Kohn-Sham determinant with increasing exact-exchange admixture in some of the cationic complexes have been traced to an interplay between spin delocalization and spin polarization.