PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 14962980

Control elements within the PWS/AS imprinting box and their function in the imprinting process.

Boris Kantor·Kirill Makedonski·Yael Green-Finberg·Ruth Shemer·Aharon Razin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A cluster of imprinted genes on human chromosome 15q11-q13 (the PWS/AS domain) and its ortholog on mouse chromosome 7c is believed to be regulated by an imprinting control center. Although minideletions in this region in Angelman syndrome (AS) and Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients revealed that two elements, shortest deletion regions of overlap in AS families and PWS families (AS-SRO and PWS-SRO), respectively, constitute the IC, the molecular mechanism that governs this regional control remains obscure. To understand how this imprinting center works, a mouse model was sought. The striking similarity between the human and mouse sequences allowed the generation of a minitransgene (AS-SMP) composed of AS-SRO and the Snrpn minimal promoter (SMP) the mouse ortholog of PWS-SRO. This minitransgene carries out, in a highly reliable and reproducible manner, all steps of the imprinting process. In an attempt to decipher the molecular mechanism of the imprinting process, we generated and tested for imprinting five minitransgenes based on AS-SMP, in which various parts of the 160 bp SMP were deleted. These experiments revealed a set of five cis elements that carry out the various steps of the imprinting process. This set includes: (i). two copies of a de novo methylation signal (DNS) that establish the maternal imprint during oogenesis; (ii). an allele discrimination signal that establishes the paternal imprint; and (iii). two elements that act together to maintain the paternal imprint. Two functionally redundant sets of the five elements were found on the respective endogenous mouse sequence explaining the previously published contradictory results of targeted deletion experiments. Together with the fact that all five elements bind specific proteins that are presumably the factors acting in trans in the imprinting process, our observations set the stage for a comprehensive study of the molecular mechanism involved in the control of the imprinting process.

Explore related subjects

AllelesAngelman SyndromeAnimalsBlotting, SouthernBrainCell LineChloramphenicol O-AcetyltransferaseDNADNA MethylationExonsFamily HealthFemaleGene DeletionGenomic ImprintingHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLModels, BiologicalModels, GeneticMutationOocytesOogenesisPrader-Willi SyndromePromoter Regions, GeneticProtein Structure, TertiaryReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTranscription, GeneticTransfectionTransgenesJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Boris Kantor, Kirill Makedonski, Yael Green-Finberg, Ruth Shemer, Aharon Razin. 2004-02-12. Control elements within the PWS/AS imprinting box and their function in the imprinting process.. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg%2Fddh085

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

A de novo algorithm for allele reconstruction from Oxford nanopore amplicon reads, with application to CYP2D6.

MOTIVATION: The Oxford Nanopore Technologies' sequencing platform offers a path towards bedside genomics, producing long reads that can completely cover a gene of interest, and detect any known or novel variant the gene contains. However, the analysis of these long reads to identify actionable genotypes remains challenging and typically requires customization depending on the target gene. RESULTS: Here, we describe a generic algorithm to accurately reconstruct allele sequences derived from long-reads of amplicon-based data. Rather than calling variants directly from these long-reads, our method takes a "sequence-first" approach, performing an unbiased reconstruction of the underlying amplicon sequences to generate high-confidence reconstructed allele sequences. This is done without user input of the target gene, allowing for any source amplicon to be reconstructed. These high-confidence reconstructed allele sequences are then compared to the genomic reference sequence of the gene to infer the specific diplotype present in the sample. This approach is agnostic towards the number of genes and alleles present and readily detects novel variants. We demonstrate our approach using three independent data sets for CYP2D6, a diverse and complex gene with over 175 known alleles of clinical significance. We show how our approach can accurately recover validated CYP2D6 diplotypes from 20 Coriell samples covering 14 distinct alleles, using different amplicons, flow cell versions, and depths. This includes inferring occurrences of allele duplication events from relative abundances of each allele, a critical factor for ascribing functional effects to a diplotype. Further, we demonstrate our approach's utility for other genomic regions, including HLA. AVAILABILITY: Custom code is available at the following GitHub repository, along with instructions for use and test data: https://github.com/scottdbrown/allele-reconstruction-long-read-amplicon-data. A snapshot of the code at the time of publication is available on Zenodo.org; doi 10.5281/zenodo.19716004. Raw .fastq sequence data for our three sequencing runs is available at the SRA under Bioproject PRJNA1357883 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/1357883).

Alleles↗
PubMed2026

Supergene control of chiral development in mirror-image flowers.

How genes determine the development of chiral structures is a fascinating question. The reciprocal placement of female and male organs on opposite sides of mirror-image flowers promotes efficient cross-pollination. Here, we identified that in butterfly lilies, female and male organs deflect by a combination of genetically controlled chirality and gravitropism, orienting left and right with respect to an external rather than internal reference axis. We found coordinated organ placement to be controlled by a hemizygous supergene containing two candidate causal loci, MIR156-R and YUCCA-R, that are responsible for opposite female and male organ orientation, respectively. The resulting differential placement of pollen carrying the two supergene alleles on pollinators' bodies leads to their transfer to the stigmas of flowers with opposite handedness and maintenance of the reproductive polymorphism.

Alleles↗
PubMed2026

DirectASRM: uncovering allele-specific post-transcriptional RNA modifications through direct RNA sequencing.

SUMMARY: We developed DirectASRM, a comprehensive database for the systematic identification, integration, and annotation of allele-specific RNA modifications (ASRMs) from direct RNA sequencing data. DirectASRM enables single-base, transcript-level detection of ASRMs across multiple RNA modification types, diverse organisms and condition-specific contexts. The database further evaluates the confidence of each ASRM-SNP pair association within isoform context by jointly considering statistical evidence of allelic modification imbalance and independent support from external next-generation sequencing (NGS) - based RNA modification resources. DirectASRM also provides extensive functional annotations for ASRMs and their associated variants, including intra-sample transcript-level allele-specific expression (ASE) and allele-specific splicing, as well as additional post-transcriptional regulatory features such as miRNA binding, circRNA, RNA-protein interactions, and disease relevance. Overall, DirectASRM serves as a comprehensive resource that supports systematic investigation of the potential functional impact of genetic variants in epitranscriptomic regulation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DirectASRM database is freely accessible at http://modinfor.com/DirectASRM/. DirectASRM pipeline is available at GitHub (https://github.com/jiayin1101/DirectASRM_pipeline) and Zenodo (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19876077).

Alleles↗