PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14967977

Put Prevention into Practice implementation model: translating practice into theory.

Abstract

Put Prevention into Practice (PPIP), a national initiative promoting evidence-based clinical preventive services, was atheoretical in its approach to change. In 1994, the Texas Department of Health began demonstration projects to implement PPIP in grantee primary care sites across the state. They funded implementation and evaluation projects that resulted in eight years of experience with the process. Gathering both qualitative and quantitative data, the Texas Department of Health and the University of Texas researchers found action research essential to learning how to successfully support clinical sites in the implementation of PPIP. The researchers also found the need for on-site consultative assistance and a participatory problem-solving approach in order to produce desired systems change. A complex adaptive systems' perspective gave theoretical justification for action research, the composition of the PPIP Implementation Model, and the importance of specific adaptation by clinics. Thus, the eight-year action research project found that a state health department desiring to implement and institutionalize quality health care should focus on: (1) context-specific consultation, (2) recognition of complexity and system-level constructs, and (3) the requirement for participatory change.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michele Murphy-Smith, Barbara Meyer, Jeffrey Hitt, Margaret A Taylor-Seehafer, Diane O Tyler. Put Prevention into Practice implementation model: translating practice into theory.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00124784-200403000-00004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Expenditures in psychiatric treatment. Is the distribution of funds according to need?].

BACKGROUND: There is no doubt that mental health care should be geared toward evidence, cost-effectiveness, and need. Health care data that allow comparisons of demand and real needs are scarce. This is especially true for outpatient care. METHOD: The aim of this study was to assess and analyze data from health insurance plans and social welfare. RESULTS: The costs of mental health care in Germany amount to 13 mio per year and 100,000 population. Health insurance schemes account for two thirds of total costs and social welfare for one third. The distribution of expenses seems not to be based on need analyses. Especially the chronically mentally ill are disadvantaged. CONCLUSIONS: The redistribution of expenses from inpatient to outpatient care including integrated health care approaches would result in more cost-effective mental health care.

Delivery of Health Care↗

Economic stability and health status: evidence from East Asia before and after the 1990s economic crisis.

The East Asian economies of Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand suffered declines in their economic growth rates in 1997. The Indonesian and Thai government followed the World Bank prescription for adjustment, which included a cut-back in government spending at a time when there were significant job losses. Malaysia chose its own path to adjustment. Evidence presented in this paper shows that although the declines were short-lived that there was an impact on the health status measured by mortality rates for the populations of Indonesia and Thailand. There was little apparent impact on the health status of Malaysians. The lessons for other developing economies include the importance of social safety nets and the maintenance of government expenditure in minimising the impact of economic shocks on health.

Delivery of Health Care↗