PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14972203

Postoperative home visits?

Abstract

PURPOSE: Because most surgery patients now recover at home rather than in the hospital, we wanted to determine whether postoperative home visits by the operating surgeon would improve medical outcomes, and whether this innovation would strengthen resident training. METHODS: A surgeon who had performed 347 procedures during a 7-month period attempted to do a home visit to each patient within 48 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Many patients had to be disqualified for various reasons, leaving 143 candidates. Of these, 44 declined to be seen, and others could not be located, so that 82 were actually visited. There were no readmissions, and no findings that might have altered the course of postoperative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These visits seemed to reinforce patient-physician relationships, but they did not influence medical outcomes. It was felt that a phone call would probably have done as well. In addition, because of new regulations governing resident working hours, it did not appear that this was a feasible educational experience.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kenneth Shapiro, Samir Patel, Scott Steinberg, George Ferzli. Postoperative home visits?. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cursur.2003.07.007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Geographic origin of publications in surgical journals.

BACKGROUND: Publications in peer-reviewed journals are the main determinants of research rating and funding. The present study assesses worldwide scientific contributions in the field of surgical research. METHODS: Fifteen major surgical journals were selected for a bibliometric search in Medline/PubMed over a 6-year period (2000-2005). All articles with abstracts were totalled according to country of corresponding author. Publications (total and corrected for population size) and journal impact factor were assessed according to country. RESULTS: A total of 18,717 articles were identified. Fifteen countries generated 88.8 per cent of these: the USA produced 42.1 per cent, Japan 9.1 per cent and the UK 7.6 per cent. When corrected for population size, the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland topped the ranking; the USA was sixth. Ireland and Switzerland scored the highest mean impact factor. CONCLUSION: The USA is the most productive country in terms of absolute number of surgical publications in the selected journals. However, when population size is taken into consideration, certain smaller European countries were more prolific.

General Surgery↗

Surgical oncology.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

General Surgery↗