PubMed · 14974769
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
It's always something.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14974769/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
This paper reports on the first national UK survey of higher education provision related to dementia care. A questionnaire was distributed to lecturers in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in England and Wales seeking information about the amount of coverage of dementia within their pre-registration and pre-qualifying courses for health and social care professionals, and continuing professional development (CPD) courses on dementia care. Information was sought regarding the content of courses, and their relation to a published "dementia curriculum" [Pulsford et al., The contribution of higher education to dementia care, Journal of Dementia Care 11(4) (2003) 27-29]. Results show that coverage of dementia within the mental health branch of pre-registration nursing programmes is very variable, and may be related to the presence of an experienced and committed lecturer within the HEI. Coverage of dementia on adult branch programmes is limited, and sometimes non-existent, despite reported deficits in the ability of general nurses to work effectively with people with dementia. Occupational Therapists and Social Workers receive similar input to adult branch nurses. CPD courses are provided by around 70% of HEIs overall, but there is a shortage of specialised diploma and degree level courses on dementia care. Most areas of the dementia curriculum are covered in both pre-registration and CPD courses, but culture and diversity, young onset dementia, and physical health care may be less well addressed. Recommendations are made for developing higher education provision for professionals working with this group of people.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: Potential bioterrorism challenges policy makers to balance competing public health priorities. Earlier surveys showed low physician bioterrorism preparedness but did not assess physicians' general public health preparedness, compare the preparedness of emergency and primary care physicians, or assess temporal trends. METHODS: This was a national, cross-sectional, random-sample survey conducted in 2003. RESULTS: Overall, 744 of 1,200 eligible physicians responded (response rate, 62%). Of these, 58% of emergency physician respondents and 48% of primary care physician respondents reported having learned a lot about responding to bioterror since September 11, 2001 (p < 0.01). However, only 43% of emergency physicians and 21% of primary care physicians agreed they are generally "well prepared to play a role in responding to a bioterror attack" (p < 0.001). Beliefs about balancing public health priorities were similar among emergency and primary care respondents. Seventy-eight percent of respondents believed that local health care systems need to be prepared for bioterrorism, and 92% believed that local health care systems need to be prepared for natural epidemics. By contrast, only 23% and 46% of respondents reported that their local health care systems are well prepared for bioterrorism and natural epidemics, respectively. Meanwhile, 77% agreed that "influenza is a greater threat to public health than bioterrorism," and 21% reported that bioterrorism preparedness efforts are diverting resources from more important public health problems. CONCLUSIONS: In 2003, most emergency and primary care physicians reported that they and their local health care systems were not yet well prepared to respond to a bioterror attack, and many believed that more resources should go toward preparing for natural epidemics. These findings highlight the importance of expanding bioterrorism preparedness efforts to improve the public health system more broadly.