PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1498109

Obstetric fractures.

S Nadas·O Reinberg
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors predisposing to an obstetric fracture, and their long-term outcome. We reviewed 28 obstetric fractures treated in the County of Vaud, Switzerland, between 1976 and 1989. There were 12 fractures of long bones, 10 clavicles and 6 depressed skull fractures. The belief that obstetric fractures occur in large babies or after breech deliveries is no longer valid. The common risk factors of these fractures are obstetric maneuvers during delivery (75% of cases), especially Cesarean sections (35%), prolonged labor (33%), and prematurity (25%). Cephalic presentation (64.2% of cases) is more frequent than breech position (32.1%). Weight, size, age of gestation, age of the mother, parity, gestity, and time of delivery cannot be considered as risk factors for obstetric fractures. For each type of fracture some specific risk factors are pointed out: maneuvers at birth for depressed skull fracture, Cesarean section, breech delivery with assistance and low birth weight for the fractures of long bones. All fractures were treated conservatively, except for skull fractures with a depression of more than 2 cm. Early consolidation is achieved within 2 weeks. Long-term prognosis for obstetric fractures is good without sequelae.

Explore related subjects

Birth InjuriesBreech PresentationCesarean SectionClavicleDystociaExtraction, ObstetricalFemaleFractures, BoneHumansInfant, NewbornObstetrical ForcepsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSkull FracturesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Nadas, O Reinberg. 1992. Obstetric fractures.. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1063431

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Intracranial hemorrhage in asymptomatic neonates: prevalence on MR images and relationship to obstetric and neonatal risk factors.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the prevalence of neonatal intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and its relationship to obstetric and neonatal risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pregnant women were recruited for a prospective study of neonatal brain development; the study was approved by the institutional review board and complied with HIPAA regulations. After informed consent was obtained from a parent, neonates were imaged with 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging without sedation. The images were reviewed by a neuroradiologist with 12 years of experience for the presence of ICH. Medical records were prospectively and retrospectively reviewed for selected risk factors, which included method of delivery, duration of labor, and evidence of maternal or neonatal birth trauma. Risk factors were assessed for relationship to ICH by using Fisher exact test statistics. RESULTS: Ninety-seven neonates (mean age at MR imaging, 20.8 days +/- 6.9 [standard deviation]) underwent MR imaging between the ages of 1 and 5 weeks. Eighty-eight (44 male and 44 female) neonates (65 with vaginal delivery and 23 with cesarean delivery) completed the MR imaging evaluation. Seventeen neonates with ICHs (16 subdural, two subarachnoid, and six parenchymal hemorrhages) were identified. Seven infants had two or more types of hemorrhages. All neonates with ICH were delivered vaginally, with a prevalence of 26% in vaginal births. ICH was significantly associated with vaginal birth (P < .005) but not with prolonged duration of labor or with traumatic or assisted vaginal birth. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic ICH following vaginal birth in full-term neonates appears to be common, with a prevalence of 26% in this study.

Birth Injuries↗
PubMed2006

Is neonatal neurological damage in the delivery room avoidable? Experience of 33 levels I and II maternity units of a French perinatal network.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of avoidable neonatal neurological damage. STUDY DESIGN: We carried out a retrospective study from January 1st to December 31st 2003, including all children transferred from a level I or II maternity unit for suspected neurological damage (SND). Only cases confirmed by a persistent abnormality on clinical examination, EEG, transfontanelle ultrasound scan, CT scan or cerebral MRI were retained. Each case was studied in detail by an expert committee and classified as "avoidable", "unavoidable" or "of indeterminate avoidability." The management of "avoidable" cases was analysed to identify potentially avoidable factors (PAFs): not taking into account a major risk factor (PAF1), diagnostic errors (PAF2), suboptimal decision to delivery interval (PAF3) and mechanical complications (PAF4). RESULTS: In total, 77 children were transferred for SND; two cases were excluded (inaccessible medical files). Forty of the 75 cases of SND included were confirmed: 29 were "avoidable", 8 were "unavoidable" and 3 were "of indeterminate avoidability". Analysis of the 29 avoidable cases identified 39 PAFs: 18 PAF1, 5 PAF2, 10 PAF3 and 6 PAF4. Five had no classifiable PAF (0 death), 11 children had one type of PAF (one death), 11 children had two types of PAF (3 deaths), 2 had three types of PAF (2 deaths). CONCLUSION: Three quarters of the confirmed cases of neurological damage occurring in levels I and II maternity units of the Aurore network in 2003 were avoidable. Five out of six cases resulting in early death involved several potentially avoidable factors.

Birth Injuries↗
PubMed2006

Diagnostic performance of MRI and MR myelography in infants with a brachial plexus birth injury.

BACKGROUND: Detailed evaluation of a brachial plexus birth injury is important for treatment planning. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic performance of MRI and MR myelography in infants with a brachial plexus birth injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included in the study were 31 children with perinatal brachial plexus injury who underwent surgical intervention. All patients had cervical and brachial plexus MRI. The standard of reference was the combination of intraoperative (1) surgical evaluation and (2) electrophysiological studies (motor evoked potentials, MEP, and somatosensory evoked potentials, SSEP), and (3) the evaluation of histopathological neuronal loss. MRI findings of cord lesion, pseudomeningocele, and post-traumatic neuroma were correlated with the standard of reference. Diagnostic performance characteristics including sensitivity and specificity were determined. RESULTS: From June 2001 to March 2004, 31 children (mean age 7.3 months, standard deviation 1.6 months, range 4.8-12.1 months; 19 male, 12 female) with a brachial plexus birth injury who underwent surgical intervention were enrolled. Sensitivity and specificity of an MRI finding of post-traumatic neuroma were 97% (30/31) and 100% (31/31), respectively, using the contralateral normal brachial plexus as the control. However, MRI could not determine the exact anatomic area (i.e. trunk or division) of the post-traumatic brachial plexus neuroma injury. Sensitivity and specificity for an MRI finding of pseudomeningocele in determining exiting nerve injury were 50% and 100%, respectively, using MEP, and 44% and 80%, respectively, using SSEP as the standard of reference. MRI in infants could not image well the exiting nerve roots to determine consistently the presence or absence of definite avulsion. CONCLUSION: In children younger than 18 months with brachial plexus injury, the MRI finding of pseudomeningocele has a low sensitivity and a high specificity for nerve root avulsion. MRI and MR myelography cannot image well the exiting nerve roots to determine consistently the presence or absence of avulsion of nerve roots. The MRI finding of post-traumatic neuroma has a high sensitivity and specificity in determining the side of the brachial plexus injury but cannot reveal the exact anatomic area (i.e. trunk or division) involved. The information obtained is, however, useful to the surgeon during intraoperative evaluation of spinal nerve integrity for reconstruction.

Birth Injuries↗