Comparing the solid phase and saline extract Microtox assays for two polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soils.

Abstract

The performance of remedial treatments is typically evaluated by measuring the concentration of specific chemicals. By adding toxicity bioassays to treatment evaluations, a fuller understanding of treatment performance is obtained. The solid phase Microtox assay is a useful tool in characterizing the toxicity of contaminated soils and sediments. This study compares the performance of the solid phase and saline extract Microtox assays in two experiments using two soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The first experiment, conducted to refine the solid phase assay procedures, evaluated sample holding times, sample replication, and reference toxicant controls. The effective concentration reducing light emission by 50% (EC50) of four samples was measured with eight replicates of each sample. Samples were stored for as long as two weeks without showing substantial changes in toxicity. For future studies, three replicates of each sample are recommended because that degree of replication yielded a statistical power of more than 95% in most samples. Phenol was a reliable reference toxicant with a mean EC50 of 21.76 and a 95% confidence interval of 15.6 to 27.9 mg/L. In a second experiment, the solid phase Microtox assay was compared to saline extract Microtox assays with mixing times ranging from 5 min to 16 h. The solid phase assay was more sensitive yielding EC50s 7 to 50 times lower than the extract EC50s. In addition, the saline extract assays displayed results that varied for mixing times of less than 2 h. Based on these two experiments, the solid phase Microtox test has proved to be a useful assay for measuring the toxicity of PAH-contaminated soils.