PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 14999455

Resource utilisation for neuropsychiatric disorders in developing countries: a multinational Delphi consensus study.

Cleusa Ferri·Dan Chisholm·Mark Van Ommeren·Martin Prince
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Substantial information is now available at a global and regional level relating to the burden of mental disorders, yet hardly any international data are available on the resources that are needed to respond to this global burden. AIMS: The aim of this study was to develop consensus-driven estimates of resource utilisation, coverage and adherence for key mental health care interventions capable of reducing leading neuropsychiatric causes of disease burden. METHODS: A resource utilisation questionnaire was developed for a series of mental health care interventions for schizophrenia, affective and anxiety disorders, alcohol misuse, epilepsy and Alzheimer's disease. Expert opinion surveys using a Delphi approach were conducted in seven countries (Brazil, China, Egypt, Ghana, India, Mexico and Thailand). Initial results were fed back to participants in order to elicit a second, final set of consensus estimates. Mean and median values were calculated, together with measures of dispersion and agreement. RESULTS: Sixty-seven psychiatrists took part in the first Delphi round and 60 completed the seven consensus panels in the second Delphi round. Expected resource use was highest for acute psychosis, mania, severe depression and severe dementia (at least monthly outpatient visits, and over 25% of cases admitted to hospital with an average length of stay one month). Aggregated estimates for current treatment coverage ranged from below 20% for Alzheimer's disease to 60% for epilepsy. Coverage and adherence levels for affective disorders were both below 50%. CONCLUSION: The Delphi technique proved to be a feasible and efficient method for data collection and consensus generation concerning mental health care resource utilisation. Results provide a set of range estimates for mental health resource planning and evaluation in a variety of developing regions.

Explore related subjects

Delphi TechniqueDeveloping CountriesHumansMental DisordersMental Health ServicesSurveys and QuestionnairesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cleusa Ferri, Dan Chisholm, Mark Van Ommeren, Martin Prince. 2004. Resource utilisation for neuropsychiatric disorders in developing countries: a multinational Delphi consensus study.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-004-0729-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Can we achieve international agreement on terminologies and definitions used to describe abnormalities of menstrual bleeding?

BACKGROUND: There is considerable worldwide confusion in the use of terminologies and definitions around the symptom of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), and these are leading increasingly to difficulties in setting up multinational clinical trials and in interpreting the results of studies undertaken in single centres. An international initiative was established to develop an agreement process to recommend clear, simple terminologies and definitions with the potential for wide acceptance. METHODS: After widespread consultation with relevant international and national organizations, journal editors and individuals, a modified Delphi process was developed to assess the current use of terminologies followed by a structured face-to-face meeting of 35 clinicians (mostly gynaecologists) and scientists in Washington. Focused small group discussions led to plenary assessment of concepts and recommendations using an electronic keypad voting system. RESULTS: There was almost universal agreement that poorly defined terms of classical origin used in differing ways in the English medical language should be discarded and that these should be replaced by simple, descriptive terms with clear definitions which have the potential to be understood by health professional and patient alike and which can be translated into most languages. The major recommendations were to replace terms such as menorrhagia, metrorrhagia, hypermenorrhoea and dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Suggestions for potentially suitable replacement terms and definitions are made. CONCLUSIONS: A simple terminology has been recommended for the description and definition of symptoms and signs of AUB. This manuscript should be a living document and should be part of an ongoing process with international medical and community debate. Classification of causes, investigations and cultural and quality of life issues should be part of the ongoing process.

Delphi Technique↗
PubMed2006

Reporting data on homeopathic treatments (RedHot): a supplement to CONSORT*.

When homeopathy is tested in clinical trials, understanding and appraisal are likely to be improved if published reports contain details of prescribing strategies and treatments. An international Delphi panel was convened to develop consensus guidelines for reporting homeopathic methods and treatments. The panel agreed 28 treatment- and provider-specific items that supplement the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement items 2, 3, 4 and 19. The authors recommend these for adoption by authors and journals when reporting trials of homeopathy.

Delphi Technique↗