PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15005329

Electrical impedance endotomography: sensitivity distribution against bipolar current patterns.

Jacques Jossinet·Anne Desseux
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Electrical impedance endotomography (EIE) is a modality where the electrodes are located around an insulating core placed inside the region of interest. This approach results in significant differences with respect to conventional EIT. The paper examines the sensitivity distribution of bipolar current patterns and the influence of the spacing between the drive electrodes using a two-dimensional (2D) mathematical model. The number of pixels of sensitivity above a given sensitivity threshold decreases faster with the distance to the probe for diametric and adjacent drive than for other bipolar drive patterns. The reconstruction of images from datasets collected in vitro using a 16-electrode probe confirmed the feasibility of the method at least within a range extending to three times the radius of the probe, under the described experimental conditions. Reduction of system noise, multiple-current patterns and the use of remote current and voltage electrodes are potential methods to increase the sensitivity range. Further work includes the improvement of the model to account for finite length electrodes and the miniaturization of the probe.

Explore related subjects

ArtifactsElectric ConductivityElectric ImpedanceHumansMaleModels, BiologicalProstateSensitivity and SpecificityTomographyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jacques Jossinet, Anne Desseux. 2004. Electrical impedance endotomography: sensitivity distribution against bipolar current patterns.. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334%2F25%2F1%2F039

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗
PubMed2008

Impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants.

Cosmetic breast implants are increasing in popularity. The presence of a breast implant overlying the anterior mediastinal space as a cause of impairment of the echocardiographic acoustic window has not been described previously. Here, we report three cases with significant impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants. Clinicians should be aware of this interference and women should be informed of this dilemma before considering this cosmetic surgery.

Artifacts↗