PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15010102

Existential pain--an entity, a provocation, or a challenge?

Peter Strang·Susan Strang·Ragnar Hultborn·Staffan Arnér
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

"Existential pain" is a widely used but ill-defined concept. Therefore the aim of this study was to let hospital chaplains (n=173), physicians in palliative care (n=115), and pain specialists (n=113) respond to the question: "How would you define the concept existential pain?" A combined qualitative and quantitative content analysis of the answers was conducted. In many cases, existential pain was described as suffering with no clear connection to physical pain. Chaplains stressed significantly more often the guilt issues, as well as various religious questions (P<0.001). Palliative physicians (actually seeing dying persons) stressed more often existential pain as being related to annihilation and impending separation (P<0.01), while pain specialists (seeing chronic patients) more often emphasized that "living is painful" (P<0.01). Thirty-two percent (32%) of the physicians stated that existential suffering can be expressed as physical pain and provided many case histories. Thus, "existential pain" is mostly used as a metaphor for suffering, but also is seen as a clinically important factor that may reinforce existing physical pain or even be the primary cause of pain, in good agreement with the current definition of pain disorder or somatization disorder.

Explore related subjects

CaregiversExistentialismHumansPainPalliative CarePastoral CareJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter Strang, Susan Strang, Ragnar Hultborn, Staffan Arnér. 2004. Existential pain--an entity, a provocation, or a challenge?. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.07.003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2025

Caregiver experiences after the death of a person with dementia with Lewy bodies: A mixed-methods analysis.

BackgroundDementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a common degenerative dementia, but no studies investigate bereaved caregiver experiences.ObjectiveTo investigate the experiences of caregivers three months after the death of persons with DLB using a mixed-methods approach.MethodsDyads of individuals with moderate-advanced DLB and their primary informal caregivers were followed prospectively every 6 months until the person with DLB died. Caregivers completed a study visit with questionnaires and a semi-structured interview &#x223c;3 months later. Spearman correlation coefficients and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests evaluated the relationships of post-death measures with pre-death patient and caregiver variables. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews.ResultsSeventy-three caregivers completed visits (mean 3.5 months post-death). Most of the caregivers were women (82.2%) and spouses (76.7%) or adult children (17.8%). Over 40% had scores indicating risk for clinical depression. Post-death caregiver experiences (depression, quality of life, grief, resilience) correlated with pre-death caregiver experiences. Post-death experiences did not associate with patient characteristics, disease-related symptoms, or healthcare services used in the last 6 months of life. Trajectories for caregiver measures from pre- to post-death visits varied widely. Interview themes included grief and sadness, anger, guilt and regret, relief, appreciation/gratitude, and adjusting to a new normal.ConclusionsThe finding that pre-death caregiving experiences have the strongest association with post-death experiences emphasizes the critical importance of accessible and evidence-based caregiver support before and after the death of a person with DLB. Research is needed to develop interventions for current and bereaved caregivers of individuals with DLB.Trial registration informationNCT04829656 (submitted 2021-03-22).

Caregivers↗
PubMed2007

[Rehabilitation of parkinsonian patients].

Although most parkinsonian patients greatly benefit from medical and/or surgical treatment, their clinical management should not be limited to these two interventions. Axial symptoms, freezing, postural instability, speech and swallowing problems may be drug-resistant, and disability may persist in spite of improvement of motor symptoms. A coordinate interdisciplinary approach facilitates the clinical management of the disease. Physiotherapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy may contribute to reduce impairment and improve quality of life; a psychological and social support of patients and caregivers helps them carrying the burden of the disease; counseling through a specialized nurse may give practical solutions to problems like bladder incontinence, symptomatic hypotension or hypersalivation. As sensory cueing may help patients bypassing the disease-specific motor control deficits, it should be included in training programs. Rehabilitatory interventions are part of the standards of care of Parkinson's disease and their efficacy is supported by several neurophysiological and clinical investigations. However, the poor methodological quality of most clinical studies as compared with the standard of pharmacological investigations fails to provide clear-cut evidence in favour of rehabilitation.

Caregivers↗