PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15033866

Extracting human protein interactions from MEDLINE using a full-sentence parser.

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The living cell is a complex machine that depends on the proper functioning of its numerous parts, including proteins. Understanding protein functions and how they modify and regulate each other is the next great challenge for life-sciences researchers. The collective knowledge about protein functions and pathways is scattered throughout numerous publications in scientific journals. Bringing the relevant information together becomes a bottleneck in a research and discovery process. The volume of such information grows exponentially, which renders manual curation impractical. As a viable alternative, automated literature processing tools could be employed to extract and organize biological data into a knowledge base, making it amenable to computational analysis and data mining. RESULTS: We present MedScan, a completely automated natural language processing-based information extraction system. We have used MedScan to extract 2976 interactions between human proteins from MEDLINE abstracts dated after 1988. The precision of the extracted information was found to be 91%. Comparison with the existing protein interaction databases BIND and DIP revealed that 96% of extracted information is novel. The recall rate of MedScan was found to be 21%. Additional experiments with MedScan suggest that MEDLINE is a unique source of diverse protein function information, which can be extracted in a completely automated way with a reasonably high precision. Further directions of the MedScan technology improvement are discussed. AVAILABILITY: MedScan is available for commercial licensing from Ariadne Genomics, Inc.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nikolai Daraselia, Anton Yuryev, Sergei Egorov, Svetalana Novichkova, Alexander Nikitin, Ilya Mazo. 2004-01-22. Extracting human protein interactions from MEDLINE using a full-sentence parser.. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics%2Fbtg452

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A comparative evaluation of full-text, concept-based, and context-sensitive search.

OBJECTIVES: Study comparatively (1) concept-based search, using documents pre-indexed by a conceptual hierarchy; (2) context-sensitive search, using structured, labeled documents; and (3) traditional full-text search. Hypotheses were: (1) more contexts lead to better retrieval accuracy; and (2) adding concept-based search to the other searches would improve upon their baseline performances. DESIGN: Use our Vaidurya architecture, for search and retrieval evaluation, of structured documents classified by a conceptual hierarchy, on a clinical guidelines test collection. MEASUREMENTS: Precision computed at different levels of recall to assess the contribution of the retrieval methods. Comparisons of precisions done with recall set at 0.5, using t-tests. RESULTS: Performance increased monotonically with the number of query context elements. Adding context-sensitive elements, mean improvement was 11.1% at recall 0.5. With three contexts, mean query precision was 42% +/- 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31% to 53%); with two contexts, 32% +/- 13% (95% CI, 27% to 38%); and one context, 20% +/- 9% (95% CI, 15% to 24%). Adding context-based queries to full-text queries monotonically improved precision beyond the 0.4 level of recall. Mean improvement was 4.5% at recall 0.5. Adding concept-based search to full-text search improved precision to 19.4% at recall 0.5. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated usefulness of concept-based and context-sensitive queries for enhancing the precision of retrieval from a digital library of semi-structured clinical guideline documents. Concept-based searches outperformed free-text queries, especially when baseline precision was low. In general, the more ontological elements used in the query, the greater the resulting precision.

Abstracting and Indexing↗

Improvements to the Red List Index.

The Red List Index uses information from the IUCN Red List to track trends in the projected overall extinction risk of sets of species. It has been widely recognised as an important component of the suite of indicators needed to measure progress towards the international target of significantly reducing the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. However, further application of the RLI (to non-avian taxa in particular) has revealed some shortcomings in the original formula and approach: It performs inappropriately when a value of zero is reached; RLI values are affected by the frequency of assessments; and newly evaluated species may introduce bias. Here we propose a revision to the formula, and recommend how it should be applied in order to overcome these shortcomings. Two additional advantages of the revisions are that assessment errors are not propagated through time, and the overall level extinction risk can be determined as well as trends in this over time.

Abstracting and Indexing↗