PubMed · 15052930
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Jane Dudman. 2004-03-18. Digital watch.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15052930/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: Despite emerging evidence that electronic health records (EHRs) can improve the efficiency and quality of medical care, most physicians in office practice in the United States do not currently use an EHR. We sought to measure the correlates of EHR adoption. DESIGN: Mailed survey to a stratified random sample of all medical practices in Massachusetts in 2005, with one physician per practice randomly selected for survey. MEASUREMENTS: EHR adoption rates. RESULTS: The response rate was 71% (1345/1884). Overall, while 45% of physicians were using an EHR, EHRs were present in only 23% of practices. In multivariate analysis, practice size was strongly correlated with EHR adoption; 52% of practices with 7 or more physicians had an EHR, as compared with 14% of solo practices (adjusted odds ratio, 3.66; 95% confidence interval, 2.28-5.87). Hospital-based practices (adjusted odds ratio, 2.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-3.91) and practices that teach medical students or residents (adjusted odds ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-3.31) were more likely to have an EHR. The most frequently cited barriers to adoption were start-up financial costs (84%), ongoing financial costs (82%), and loss of productivity (81%). CONCLUSIONS: While almost half of physicians in Massachusetts are using an EHR, fewer than one in four practices in Massachusetts have adopted EHRs. Adoption rates are lower in smaller practices, those not affiliated with hospitals, and those that do not teach medical students or residents. Interventions to expand EHR use must address both financial and non-financial barriers, especially among smaller practices.
The purpose of this paper is to provide future directions for the usage of Internet communities (ICs) for recruitment of research participants based on issues raised in an Internet survey among 132 cancer patients. About 317 general and 233 ethnic-specific Internet Cancer Support Groups and 1588 ethnic-specific ICs were contacted to recruit cancer patients. Research staff recorded issues and wrote memos during the recruitment process. The written memos and records were later analyzed using content analysis. The issues included: (a) difficulty in identifying appropriate ICs and potential participants, (b) meta-tags, (c) dominant white and women groups, (d) dynamics inside ICs, (e) difficulty in trust building, and (f) potential selection bias. The findings suggest that researchers thoroughly review the ICs' information, be recognizant of potential gender and ethnic issues and current trends in Internet interaction, and consider potential selection bias.
Integrated information systems for managing patient data transform the nature of hospital work to the extent that the work practices, the responsibilities, even the professional identities are likely to undergo major changes. Therefore, during the organizational implementation of the IS, attention should be paid to the future users and how they understand and see what is going on. Here the focus is on these interpretation processes, analyzed as technological frames. That is, people develop different assumptions, expectations and knowledge concerning new technology. During this sense-making process they build their idea of that technology, its technological frame. We analyzed the pre-implementation frames that could be discerned in 24 interviews of hospital personnel. Main influences on the frames in this case were the work role in the organization, knowledge about the new system, and attitudes toward the old systems. The social context appeared to have a significant influence in the users' interpretation processes and the frames seemed to be congruent within one group. So far, the incongruence between groups appeared to have caused no major problems for the implementation.