PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15073989

Drug-attributed anaphylaxis.

Abstract

Allergic type I reactions to medicines range in their clinical presentation from rhinitis and urticaria to severe bronchoconstriction and anaphylactic shock. We examined all cases of suspected drug induced reactions classified as anaphylactic reactions or shock reported in Sweden between 1972 and 1995 with regard to patient characteristics and drug(s) suspected. Some comparisons with drug sales and prescription data were also made. During the study period of a total of 1338 reports concerned anaphylactic/oid shock or reactions with at least a possible causal relation to medicine giving an overall reporting rate of seven cases per million inhabitants per year of drug-induced anaphylaxis. Of these 1338 patients 51 (3.8%) died from their reactions. Among the non-fatal cases, 460 (34.4%) were diagnosed as shock and 827 (61.8%) as anaphylactic reactions. In total 46.3% of all reports concerned men but men were over-represented among the older patients and among the fatal cases (65%). There were 201 different drugs reported as 'suspected' them most common of which were dextrans (418 reports), X-ray contrast media (161 reports) and antibiotics (153 reports). For dextrans the rate of anaphylactic reactions, shock and fatal cases reported were 128,101 and 21 per million bottles respectively. This decreased to 10.3, 9.8, and 0.4 per million bottles after the introduction of preventive treatment with dextran 1 in 1983.The reporting rate for ionic contrast media were 0.14, 0.13 and 0.02 per 1000 l for reactions, shock and fatal cases respectively whilst for non-ionic contrast media they were 0.7/1000 l for reactions, 0.02/1000 l for shock, but there was no report of a fatal case. For phenoxymethylpenicillin the reported rate of anaphylaxis was 0.14 cases per million defined daily doses and for benzylpenicillin it was 3.7 cases per million defined daily doses. During the study period several drugs have been identified as important causes of anaphylaxis and measures have been taken to decrease the risk of anaphylaxis e.g. the introduction of preventive treatment with dextran 1, the shift from ionic to non-ionic contrast media and the abolition of polyethoxylated castor oil as a solvent. Spontaneous reporting of drug-induced anaphylaxis remains an important surveillance model but needs to be complemented by better quantitative methods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Y Wang, C Forslund, U Persson, B E Wiholm. 1998. Drug-attributed anaphylaxis.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1557(199807%2F08)7%3A4%3C269%3A%3Aaid-pds366%3E3.0.co%3B2-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗