PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1508342

[Hypoxemia after heart surgery. An exception or a normal development?].

Abstract

The course of respiratory exchange through arterial blood gas analysis after coronary bypass-grafting and valvular replacement has been investigated in a cohort of 62 patients. Arterial blood gases were measured at baseline (the day before surgery), and then 1, 2, 3 and 9 days after surgery; in a subset of 18 patients, randomly selected from the same population, pulmonary function tests were also performed at baseline and repeated on day 9. Arterial blood gases showed a remarkable prevalence of hypoxaemia (as defined as arterial PaO2 less than 60 mmHg): 31% on the first, 50% on the second, and 40% on the third post-operative day; anemia and desaturated mixed venous blood were also prominent findings during the first two days. Arterial PO2 resulted higher afterward, although its mean value then was significantly lower than baseline (81.5 +/- 8.8 vs 93.1 +/- 9 mmHg, p less than 0.005). Pulmonary function tests evidenced widespread restrictive changes, with alterated thoraco-pulmonary mechanics (loss of more than 40% of vital capacity and one second forced expiratory flow) and parenchimal lung damage (residual volume and CO diffusion capacity decrease). Some differences in PaO2 course between coronary patients and valvular patients have been releaved; the mean basal PaO2 value of valvular was significantly lower then the other one (86.7 +/- 10.8 vs 94.7 +/- 10.9, p less than 0.05).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Rapati, A Morandi, A Pajè, C Brambillasca, R Ravagnan. 1992. [Hypoxemia after heart surgery. An exception or a normal development?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1508342/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Invited commentary.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

Current trends in coronary artery disease in women.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are some striking sex differences regarding presentation, symptoms and sign, diagnosis, and treatment of coronary artery disease. Historically, healthcare delivery to women has been plagued with treatment bias favoring men. This review will present relevant cardiovascular physiologic sex differences, current treatment options for coronary artery disease both surgical and medical, and clinical outcomes of such treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: In the past, pharmacologic and interventional studies generally excluded women from their subjects. As a result, women have been traditionally treated based on the findings in their male counterparts. Recent studies examining sex differences in the treatment of coronary artery disease have given new insight into the hormonal and behavioral influences associated with coronary artery disease. Finally, these studies have drawn attention to possibly inadvertent discrepancies in the way men and women are treated for coronary artery disease. SUMMARY: Despite significant advances in medical and surgical approaches to treat coronary artery disease, it remains and will continue to be the most important healthcare challenge of the 21st century. Whereas efforts are underway to encourage inclusion of more women in therapeutic trials, the educational process, particularly in medical school, needs to broadly address sex specific pathophysiology and treatment, rather than relying on sub-subspecialty training for optimizing healthcare delivery in women.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗