PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15086311

Seeing depth coherence and transparency.

Abstract

Gratings with different disparities are sometimes seen as transparent surfaces, each with a distinct depth, when they are superimposed, and sometimes they are seen as a coherent plaid confined to a single depth plane--stereo analogs of transparent and coherent motion. Briefly presented sinusoidal gratings of similar spatial frequencies are seen to cohere in depth. The resulting plaid generally appears in a depth plane different from that of either component grating viewed separately; the plaid may even appear on the oppose side of fixation from the component gratings. Under similar viewing conditions, squarewave gratings are typically seen as transparent. Objective measures, gathered here using depth-order discriminations, show that the perception of transparency between squarewave gratings requires a minimum disparity difference that varies with the gratings' orientations. Gratings that are near orthogonal in orientation, or that give the plaid a near-horizontal disparity, favor the perception of coherence. Gratings that form a plaid having a large ratio of vertical to horizontal disparities favor the perception of transparency. The data are consistent with a Bayesian prior favoring single surfaces when disparities are small and near-horizontal. Disparities that are large or non-horizontal are more likely to be aperture disparities that result from viewing separate but overlapping surfaces. The sinewave-squarewave difference leads to the conclusion that coherence between components is required both for seeing a broadband pattern in a single depth plane and for seeing it in a different depth plane from other superimposed patterns.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bart Farell, Simone Li. 2004-03-30. Seeing depth coherence and transparency.. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.3.8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sequence learning under dual-task conditions: alternatives to a resource-based account.

In two experiments with the serial reaction-time task, participants were presented with deterministic or probabilistic sequences under single- or dual-task conditions. Experiment 1 showed that learning of a probabilistic structure was not impaired over a first session by performing a counting task, but that such an interference arose over a second session, when the knowledge was tested under single-task conditions. In contrast, the effects of the secondary task arose earlier for participants exposed to deterministic sequences. This difference between deterministic and probabilistic sequences disappeared in Experiment 2, where the counting task was performed on tones associated to the locations. Comparisons between sessions indicated that the secondary task affected not only the expression but also the acquisition of sequence learning, and that greater interference was observed in those conditions that yielded more explicit knowledge. These results suggest that the effects of a dual task on the measures of implicit sequence learning may be partly due to the intrusion of explicit knowledge and partly due to the disruption of the sequence produced by the inclusion of random events.

Cues↗

A new look at binocular stereopsis.

We report a new phenomenon, which illustrates that the role of binocular disparity in 3D shape perception critically depends on whether the parts are interpreted as belonging to a single object. The nature of this phenomenon was studied in four experiments. In the first two experiments the subjects were shown a sequence of stereoscopic images of a cube, in which binocular disparity indicated that the individual parts move towards or away from one eye. However, when the parts of the cube were perceived as elements of a single object, they appeared to move in a rigid fashion and the direction of motion was orthogonal to that predicted by the binocular disparities. The third experiment generalized these results to more complex polyhedra. The last experiment showed that constraints related to motion, such as rigidity, are important, but not critical for this phenomenon to occur. All these results imply that the interpretation as to what corresponds to a single object affects the importance (weight) of binocular disparity and may even eliminate its contribution altogether; the percept of a 3D shape is dominated by a priori constraints, and depth cues play a secondary role.

Cues↗