PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15088863

Multimodal therapy for interstitial cystitis.

Abstract

Gynecologists have been challenged by the diversity in treatment approaches and the historical absence of effective therapy for interstitial cystisis (IC). Until recently, the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment was bladder instillation with dimethyl sulfoxide, a moderately effective and safe, albeit invasive, process. The approval in 1996 of pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) provided IC patients with an effective and safe oral regimen that specifically targets and repairs the damaged urothelium. Intravesical administration of heparin sulfate or PPS, while not FDA indicated, has also been shown to provide symptom relief. Patients with moderate to severe disease may require a multimodal therapeutic approach utilizing PPS as the foundation. Oral PPS can be combined with antihistamines, analgesics, antispasmodics or antidepressants to provide enhanced pain and symptom relief. Patients with severe disease or flares may benefit from instillation of an anesthetic therapeutic relief solution composed of heparin or PPS combined with sodium bicarbonate and lidocaine. Nonpharmacologic approaches, such as bladder training, biofeedback and dietary changes, can provide supplemental relief. Acute and chronic pain associated with IC can now be effectively managed using a multimodal approach with PPS as the basis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jeffrey R Dell, C Lowell Parsons. 2004. Multimodal therapy for interstitial cystitis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15088863/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Hematogenous contact dermatitis after intravesicular instillation of mitomycin C].

Mitomycin C is an alkylating chemotherapeutic agent which is instilled intravesically to prevent recurrence of superficial bladder carcinomas. After several cycles of mitomycin C, our patient developed a pruritic genital dermatitis and palmar desquamation. Following exclusion of a fungal infection, we performed patch tests using the standard series, the major basic ointment ingredients, disinfectants, and mitomycin C in concentrations of 0.001 to 0.1%; the resulting diagnosis was allergic contact dermatitis due to delayed-type hypersensitivity to mitomycin C. The skin rash rapidly resolved with application of topical steroids, and the intravesical chemotherapy was changed to doxorubicin. Eczematous skin reactions are quite common side effects after intravesical instillation of mitomycin C. In the majority of cases, they are caused by delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions, presumably elicited by hematogenous spread of the allergen, and not by irritation. The sensitization most likely occurs via the bladder mucosa. In order to differentiate between allergic and toxic contact dermatitis, patch tests with the above-mentioned mitomycin C concentrations are useful. In cases of mild allergic contact dermatitis the intravesical chemotherapy might be continued with concomitant topical steroids.

Administration, Intravesical↗

[Intravesical cidofovir--instillation therapy for polyomavirus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis after bone marrow transplantation].

Viral infections of the urogenital tract are a potential problem in patients taking immunosuppressive medication. We report a 14 year old male patient with hemorrhagic cystitis who had undergone bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Attempts at coagulation as well as instillation treatment and continuous bladder irrigation were not sufficient to stop bleeding. Sequential to these procedures, local instillation with cidofovir into the bladder was started to treat a suspected infection with polyomavirus and the gross hematuria stopped within a few days.

Administration, Intravesical↗

Intravesical atropine compared to oral oxybutynin for neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a double-blind, randomized crossover trial.

PURPOSE: We tested the efficacy and side effect profiles of intravesical atropine compared to oxybutynin immediate release when used by individuals with multiple sclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a study to determine the most effective dose of atropine. Eight participants used increasing doses of intravesical atropine during a 12-day period. Bladder diary data showed that the instillation of 6 mg atropine 4 times daily was most effective for increasing bladder capacity (voided/catheter volumes). We then did a randomized, double-blind crossover trial. Participants received 14 days of treatment with oral oxybutynin or with intravesical atropine, followed by 14 days of alternative treatment. Participants recorded a bladder diary and rated side effects and quality of life. The primary outcome variable was bladder capacity. RESULTS: A total of 57 participants with multiple sclerosis completed the study. Average change in bladder capacity was higher in the atropine arm. The mean +/- SD oxybutynin change was 55.5 +/- 67.2 ml, the mean atropine change was 79.6 +/- 89.6 ml and the mean difference between arms was 24.1 ml (95% CI -0.4, 49.7; p = 0.053). Changes in incontinence events and voiding frequency were not statistically different between the arms. Changes in total side effect and dry mouth scores were significantly better in the atropine treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical atropine was as effective as oxybutynin immediate release for increasing bladder capacity and it was probably better with less antimuscarinic side effects. We recommend that intravesical atropine should be made available to patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity and voiding problems requiring intermittent catheterization as an alternative to oral therapy, which often has troublesome side effects.

Administration, Intravesical↗