PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15099862

Routine CMV screening during pregnancy.

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) screening during pregnancy has been widely discussed for several years, but still no consensus has been agreed. With a number of live births of 750,000 per year in France, we would expect 7500 infected infants at birth per year (rate of congenital infection of 1%). Among infected infants at birth, the number of severely infected foetuses would be approximately 75, the number of infants with severe sequelae would be 480, 675 approximately would present with hearing loss and the number of asymptomatic infants would be 6270. Five different preventive methods for congenital CMV infection are possible: (1) Routine CMV screening at the beginning of pregnancy for primary prevention. (2) Secondary prevention by antenatal diagnosis of congenital CMV infection complications. (3) Tertiary prevention by serological testing during pregnancy. (4) Tertiary prevention by serological screening at birth. (5) Tertiary prevention: Hearing loss screening at birth. The aims of this review are to define the advantages and disadvantages of these different methods of CMV screening during pregnancy and to determine if the current available information would make systematic testing acceptable.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Collinet, D Subtil, V Houfflin-Debarge, N Kacet, A Dewilde, F Puech. 2004-05-10. Routine CMV screening during pregnancy.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.09.016

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Etiology and impact of cytomegalovirus disease on solid organ transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: The characteristics, etiology, natural history, and direct and indirect effects of CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients are described. SUMMARY: CMV is a common herpesvirus that may be present in the donor or recipient of a solid organ transplant. Even though it is rarely pathogenic in healthy patients, transplant recipients are at risk for CMV viremia and symptomatic disease due to their immune-suppressed status. In addition to symptoms directly attributed to active disease, CMV can have a variety of indirect effects. Indirect effects may include additional infectious complications, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease, allograft rejection, allograft loss, or death. The three most prevalent risk factors for CMV infection are CMV seronegativity in a recipient of an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor, the type of organ transplanted, and the degree of immune suppression. CMV prophylaxis is effective at preventing disease, but may result in a delayed onset where CMV disease occurs once the prophylaxis is stopped. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of risk factors for CMV infection and disease, the natural history in transplant recipients, and its direct and indirect effects will help clinicians make appropriate decisions regarding the use of preventive strategies.

Cytomegalovirus Infections↗