PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15102933

Agonist binding: a multistep process.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Brian Kobilka. 2004. Agonist binding: a multistep process.. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.65.5.1060

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Epinephrine induces tissue perfusion deficit in porcine endotoxin shock: evaluation by regional CO(2) content gradients and lactate-to-pyruvate ratios.

Epinephrine is widely used as a vasoconstrictor or inotrope in shock, although it may typically induce or augment lactic acidosis. Ongoing debate addresses the question of whether hyperlactatemia per se is a sign of tissue perfusion deficit or aerobic glycolysis. We wanted to test the hypothesis that epinephrine has selective detrimental effects on visceral perfusion and metabolism. We performed rigorous regional venous blood gas analyses as well as intraperitoneal microdialysis. We used a mathematical model to calculate regional arteriovenous CO(2) content gradients and estimated the magnitude of the Haldane effect in a porcine model of prolonged hypotensive shock induced by endotoxin infusion (mean arterial blood pressure < 60 mmHg). Subsequently, vasopressors (epinephrine or norepinephrine) were administered and adjusted to maintain systemic mean arterial pressure > 70 mmHg for 4 h. Epinephrine caused systemic hyperlactatemia and acidosis. Importantly, both systemic and regional venous lactate-to-pyruvate ratios increased. Epinephrine was associated with decreasing portal blood flow despite apparently maintained total splanchnic blood flow. Epinephrine increased gastric venous-to-arterial Pco(2) gradients and CO(2) content gradients with decreasing magnitude of the Haldane effect, and the regional gastric respiratory quotient remained higher after epinephrine as opposed to norepinephrine infusion. In addition, epinephrine induced intraperitoneal lactate and glycerol release. We did not observe these adverse hemodynamic or metabolic changes related to norepinephrine with the same arterial pressure goal. We conclude that high CO(2) content gradients with decreasing magnitude of the Haldane effect pinpoint the most pronounced perfusion deficiency to the gastric wall when epinephrine, as opposed to norepinephrine, is used in experimental endotoxin shock.

Adrenergic Agonists↗

Noradrenaline-induced cation currents in isolated rat paratracheal ganglion neurons.

The actions of noradrenaline (NA) on the neurons acutely isolated from paratracheal ganglia of rats and the ionic mechanisms involved were studied with nystatin-perforated patch recording configuration. Under current-clamp conditions, application of 10 microM NA produced membrane depolarization followed by repetitive action potentials. NA evoked an inward cationic current under voltage-clamp conditions at a holding potential of -60 mV. Transient tail inward ('hump') current was also induced by washout of NA. The NA-induced current was reduced by extracellular Ca(2+) and Mg(2+), with half-maximal concentrations of 0.7 and 2.6 mM for Ca(2+) and Mg(2+), respectively. Phenylephrine, an alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist, mimicked the NA-induced current, but the 'hump' current did not occur upon washout of phenylephrine. The NA-induced current was inhibited by prazosin and WB-4101, alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists. In contrast, in the presence of yohimbine, an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist, the NA-induced current was potentiated and the washout of NA failed to evoke the 'hump' current. The pretreatment of paratracheal neurons with pertussis toxin also potentiated the NA-induced current. The NA-induced inward current was inhibited by pretreatment with U73122, a phospholipase C inhibitor, and xestospongin-C, a membrane-permeable IP(3) receptor antagonist. On the other hand, thapsigargin, BAPTA-AM and calmidazolium had no effect on the NA-induced current, suggesting that release of Ca(2+) from intracellular Ca(2+) stores via IP(3) receptors is not involved in the NA action. The cationic channels activated by NA play an important physiological role in neuronal membrane depolarization in rat paratracheal ganglia.

Adrenergic Agonists↗

Agonist binding and activation of the rat beta(1)-adrenergic receptor: role of Trp(134(3.28)), Ser(190(4.57)) and Tyr(356(7.43)).

We investigated the role of Trp(134(3.28)), Ser(190(4.57)) and Tyr(356(7.43)) in agonist binding to, and activation of, the rat beta(1)-adrenergic receptor by comparing pK(i)s and functional responses of W134A, S190A and Y356F mutant receptors to wild type, all stably expressed in CHO cells. All three mutations significantly (P < 0.05) reduced adenylyl cyclase intrinsic activity (IA) compared to wild type in response to stimulation with both (-)-isoprenaline (53-88%) and (-)-RO363 (46-61%), and there was no significant correlation either between IA or pD(2) and pK(i) (P > 0.4), suggesting that changes in pK(i) were not sufficient to explain the fall in adenylyl cyclase activity. The most pronounced reduction in affinity (126-fold, P < 0.01) was displayed by xamoterol for the Y356F mutation, suggesting that xamoterol is able to directly interact with Tyr(356(7.43)). For the other agonists, the change in pK(i) values for the mutant receptors ranged from a 20-fold decrease to a 2-fold increase compared to the wild type. In a three-dimensional model of the rat beta(1)-adrenergic receptor, Trp(134(3.28)) and Tyr(356(7.43)) form part of a hydrophobic binding pocket involving residues in transmembrane helices 1, 2, 3 and 7. Our results suggest that Trp(134(3.28)) and Tyr(356(7.43)), together with Trp(353(7.40)), are able to interact via pi-pi interactions to stabilize the extracellular ends of transmembrane helices 3 and 7. Ser(190(4.57)) appears to be involved in a hydrogen bonding network, which maintains the spatial relationship between transmembrane helices 3 and 4. These interhelical interactions suggest that the three mutated residues stabilize the active receptor state by maintaining the proper packing of their respective transmembrane helix within the helix bundle, facilitating the appropriate movement and rotation of the transmembrane regions during the activation process.

Adrenergic Agonists↗