Immunomodulating agents.

Cecil P Moore

doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2004.01.002

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15110981

Immunomodulating agents.

Cecil P Moore

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Inflammation involves a universally recognized, although incompletely understood, cascade of molecular events orchestrated by lymphokines and other innate biochemicals of immunity. Repeated or extended contact with immunogenic agents results in adaptive immunity involving antigen-induced events that stimulate down-stream immune cells and result in expansion of the inflammatory cascade. When immunogenic stimulation persists or autoregulatory immune mechanisms go awry, however, adaptive immunologic events can result in immune-mediated processes detrimental to systemic or organ-specific homeostasis. Because of the complexities of immunologic events, the potential side effects of long-term corticosteroid therapy, and the focused spectrum of most conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (centered on arachidonic acid-related mechanisms), a variety of other chemotherapeutic immunosuppressive agents have assumed an increasingly prominent therapeutic role in veterinary ophthalmology in the management of chronic ocular inflammatory diseases. In addition, nonimmunosuppressive immunomodulating agents (ie, immuno-stimulants or immunorestoratives) may be used as adjunctive therapies in the management of ocular or visual system diseases.

Explore related subjects

Adjuvants, Immunologic Administration, Topical Animals Animals, Domestic Eye Diseases Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca Ophthalmic Solutions Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Cecil P Moore. 2004. Immunomodulating agents.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2004.01.002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2005

Melatonin reduces prostate cancer cell growth leading to neuroendocrine differentiation via a receptor and PKA independent mechanism.

BACKGROUND: Melatonin, the main secretory product of the pineal gland, inhibits the growth of several types of cancer cells. Melatonin limits human prostate cancer cell growth by a mechanism which involves the regulation of androgen receptor function but it is not clear whether other mechanisms may also be involved. METHODS: Time-course and dose-dependent studies were performed using androgen-dependent (LNCaP) and independent (PC3) prostate cancer cells. Cell number, cell viability, and cell cycle progression were studied. Neuroendocrine differentiation of these cells was evaluated by studying morphological and biochemical markers. Finally, molecular mechanisms including the participation of melatonin membrane receptors, intracellular cAMP levels, and the PKA signal transduction pathway were also analyzed. RESULTS: Melatonin treatment dramatically reduced the number of prostate cancer cells and stopped cell cycle progression in both LNCaP and PC3 cells. In addition, it induced cellular differentiation as indicated by obvious morphological changes and neuroendocrine biochemical parameters. The role of melatonin in cellular proliferation and differentiation of prostate cancer cells is not mediated by its membrane receptors nor related to PKA activation. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of prostate cancer cells with pharmacological concentrations of melatonin influences not only androgen-sensitive but also androgen-insensitive epithelial prostate cancer cells. Cell differentiation promoted by melatonin is not mediated by PKA activation although it increases, in a transitory manner, intracellular cAMP levels. Melatonin markedly influences the proliferative status of prostate cancer cells. These effects should be evaluated thoroughly since melatonin levels are diminished in aged individuals when prostate cancer typically occurs.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed2005

Induction of PSA-specific CTLs and anti-tumor immunity by a genetic prostate cancer vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in Swedish and American men. Effective curative treatment modalities are debilitating and available only for localized disease. As an immunotherapy approach, DNA encoding prostate-specific antigen (PSA), was used to immunize mice and induce PSA-specific cellular immunity. METHODS: A plasmid expressing PSA, alone or in combination with plasmids coding for GM-CSF and/or IL-2, was used for DNA immunization. Cr-release, intracellular IFN-gamma cytokine staining, and tumor challenge assays were used to evaluate the immune response. RESULTS: The DNA vaccine induces PSA-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and when co-injected with IL-2 and GM-CSF it protects four of five mice against a PSA-expressing tumor challenge. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that immunization with a PSA DNA vaccine can evoke PSA-specific cellular immune responses. We also show, for the first time, that a PSA DNA vaccine can induce anti-tumor immunity in vivo.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed2004

Enhancement of the immunogenicity of DNA vaccine against infectious bursal disease virus by co-delivery with plasmid encoding chicken interleukin 2.

The immunoregulatory activity of a nonmammalian interleukin 2 (IL-2), chicken IL-2 (chIL-2), was investigated using a DNA vaccine against infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) as a model. Coadministration of a plasmid encoding the VP2 gene of IBDV (pCI-VP2) and a plasmid encoding chicken IL-2 gene (pCI-chIL-2) enhances bursal protection against both the homologous IBDV strain ZJ2000 and the heterologous strain BC6/85 compared to administration of pCI-VP2 alone. Vaccination with pCI-VP2 alone induces low bursal protection against ZJ2000 and only protects chickens from clinical outbreaks and mortality, but not from bursal damage caused by BC6/85. Co-administration of the plasmid encoding the polyprotein gene of IBDV (pCI-VP2/4/3) and pCI-chIL-2 provides complete protection (15/15) against ZJ2000 and satisfactory protection (13/15) against BC6/85. In contrast, only 10 out of 15 chickens and 6 out of 15 chickens were protected against ZJ2000 and BC6/85, respectively, using the pCI-VP2/4/3 vaccination alone. A significant increase in the IBDV-specific neutralizing antibody response was also observed in chickens that received pCI-VP2/4/3 plus pCI-chIL-2 as compared with those that received the pCI-VP2/4/3 vaccination alone. By administrating different amounts of plasmid DNA, we confirmed that the pCI-chIL-2, but not the backbone plasmid pCI, contributes to increased immunoprotection of DNA vaccine against IBDV. These results strongly indicate that the efficacy of avian DNA vaccine can be modulated by co-administration of a plasmid encoding chIL-2.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗