PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15126649

Improving outcomes in hyperphosphataemia.

Abstract

Preclinical studies have shown that lanthanum has a very high phosphate-binding capacity at gastrointestinal pH, while clinical trials have shown lanthanum carbonate to be an effective, well-tolerated phosphate binder for the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in patients with end-stage renal disease. Optimization of bone health is an important issue in these patients, and, based on theoretical grounds, there have been concerns that lanthanum will have toxic effects on bone similar to those of aluminium. However, compared with aluminium, absorption of lanthanum is extremely low and lanthanum treatment is not associated with systemic toxicity. In addition, unlike aluminium, elimination of lanthanum is not through the kidney, but mainly takes place via the biliary route and is, therefore, independent of renal function. This implies that patients with chronic renal failure are not at an increased risk for accumulation of the element, compared with patients with normal renal function. In animal studies, no adverse effects on bone were seen in healthy animals receiving lanthanum carbonate. In 5/6th nephrectomized rats, very high doses of lanthanum (1000-2000 mg/kg) affected bone mineralization. This was not due to a direct toxic effect on bone, but was secondary to phosphate depletion induced by lanthanum and, as with any gastro-intestinal phosphate-binding agent, can be reversed with a phosphate-supplemented diet. In a phase III clinical trial, bone biopsies were taken from dialysis patients at baseline and after 1 year of treatment with either lanthanum carbonate (median dose, 1250 mg/day) or calcium carbonate (median dose, 2000 mg/day). Patients treated with lanthanum carbonate for 1 year did not experience any of the aluminium-like toxic effects on bone expressed as either osteomalacia or adynamic bone disease.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marc E De Broe, Patrick C D'Haese, Lanthanum Study Group. 2004. Improving outcomes in hyperphosphataemia.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt%2Fgfh1003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Minimization of sample size when comparing two small probabilities in a non-inferiority safety trial.

In clinical trials success rates of two treatments to be compared often range from 10 to 90 per cent. When the comparison probabilities are (much) smaller than 10 per cent, standard methods for sample size and power calculations may provide invalid results. This situation may occur when there is interest in safety rather than in efficacy. In such trials, no more patients should be included than strictly necessary. We compared the results of maximum likelihood methods for the computation of sample sizes in a non-inferiority trial, including exact procedures and considered unequal sample sizes for experimental and reference treatment. An exact, unequal sample size maximum likelihood procedure is advocated when the specified non-zero risk difference under the null hypothesis is not too large. Such a procedure is also indicated when the parameter of interest is the relative risk, rather than the risk difference.

Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic↗

On the estimation of the binomial probability in multistage clinical trials.

Due to the optional sampling effect in a sequential design, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) following sequential tests is generally biased. In a typical two-stage design employed in a phase II clinical trial in cancer drug screening, a fixed number of patients are enrolled initially. The trial may be terminated for lack of clinical efficacy of treatment if the observed number of treatment responses after the first stage is too small. Otherwise, an additional fixed number of patients are enrolled to accumulate additional information on efficacy as well as on safety. There have been numerous suggestions for design of such two-stage studies. Here we establish that under the two-stage design the sufficient statistic, i.e. stopping stage and the number of treatment responses, for the parameter of the binomial distribution is also complete. Then, based on the Rao-Blackwell theorem, we derive the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) as the conditional expectation of an unbiased estimator, which in this case is simply the maximum likelihood estimator based only on the first stage data, given the complete sufficient statistic. Our results generalize to a multistage design. We will illustrate features of the UMVUE based on two-stage phase II clinical trial design examples and present results of numerical studies on the properties of the UMVUE in comparison to the usual MLE.

Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic↗