PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15129454

Increase input, optimize output.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Ingala, K Hill. 2001. Increase input, optimize output.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006247-200107000-00014

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A year in Bristol. Back from the red.

United Bristol Healthcare trust has pulled back from a predicted 3.5m pounds sterling deficit to achieve zero balance. It faces a raft of new challenges, ranging from tough cancer targets to censure over waiting-list breaches. The trust has cut the use of nursing agencies drastically, with 95 per cent of nurses now bank staff. Non-clinical issues such as litter, food and the appearance of buildings are also being tackled.

Decision Making, Organizational↗

Priority setting in hospitals: fairness, inclusiveness, and the problem of institutional power differences.

Priority setting tends to take place in health care settings that are hierarchical and politically complex. Fair processes, as defined for example by Daniels' and Sabin's accountability for reasonableness framework, have been identified as essential for securing socially acceptable priority setting decisions. However, power differences in the decision-making context can pose a serious impediment to fair priority setting in health care organizations. Comparatively little attention has been paid to examining the institutional conditions within which priority setting decisions are made. We review a case study of priority setting in hospital operational planning in Toronto, which had been designed by executive leaders to be broadly inclusive of senior and middle-level clinical and administrative leaders. We report three power differences that arose as limiting factors on the inclusiveness of the priority setting process. We argue that these findings have significant theoretical implications for the accountability for reasonableness framework and propose a fifth condition, the "empowerment condition", which states that there should be efforts to minimise power differences in the decision-making context and to optimise effective opportunities for participation in priority setting.

Decision Making, Organizational↗