PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15129474

The collaborative method. A strategy for improving Australian general practice.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom National Primary Care Collaborative (NPCC) is said to be the largest health service improvement project in the world. The 2000 practices participating serve 11.5 million patients throughout the UK. Improvements such as a 60% reduction in waiting times to see a general practitioner and a four-fold reduction in coronary heart disease mortality have drawn the attention of policy makers in Australia. In 2003, I accompanied a group of Australians to Manchester in the UK to participate in an international training course in collaboratives hosted by the NPCC. The Australian government has recently called for tenders to run the Australian Primary Care Collaborative (APCC) program. OBJECTIVE: To describe the NPCC and discuss how the methodology could be adapted and applied to Australia. DISCUSSION: The Australian primary health care system faces challenges in application of evidence to patient care. Collaborative methodology warrants consideration to address these. Differences including distance, business issues, remuneration mechanisms, infrastructure deficiencies and clinician cynicism present challenges in adaptation and application to Australia. Given adequate support, an APCC could empower general practices to continue to make improvements in many areas of activity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrew Knight. 2004. The collaborative method. A strategy for improving Australian general practice.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15129474/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Whole genome characterisation of Australian and New Zealand OsHV-1 'μVar' like variants over time.

Ostreid herpesvirus 1 (OsHV-1) is a major pathogen of Pacific oysters (Magallana gigas), linked to mass mortality events worldwide and presents a substantial threat to global aquaculture. Since 2010, mortality events have been occurring in Pacific oysters within Australia with the cause being an OsHV-1 microvariant highly similar to OsHV-1 μVar first detected in France, 2008. In this study, fifteen OsHV-1 whole genomes were assembled from Australian and New Zealand mortality events, including twelve newly sequenced genomes and three assembled from public datasets. Whole-genome phylogenetic analyses indicate that Australian and New Zealand OsHV-1 isolates form a distinct clade, separate from European and East Asian genomes, and with moderate regional and temporal divergence across the past 14 years. Across the dataset, multiple biologically relevant mutations were observed in genes of known function, including DNA polymerase, ribonucleotide reductase subunits, and apoptosis-related proteins, though most mutations occurred in uncharacterised genes. These findings highlight the limitations of single-gene typing and support the need for whole-genome approaches in understanding OsHV-1 evolution. Critically, the lack of recent whole-genome data, particularly from East and Southeast Asia, restricts the ability to trace viral origins and detect novel variants, underscoring the need for expanded global OsHV-1 genomic surveillance.

Australia↗

Interest holder-driven research priorities in sexual and reproductive health for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and prioritise sexual and reproductive health research priorities for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults in Australia using a priority setting partnership approach. METHODS: A James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership was conducted with 92 interest holders: 31 youth from migrant and refugee backgrounds and 61 professionals (healthcare providers, researchers, policymakers and community leaders), recruited online and in-person. The priority setting partnership process included a rapid evidence scan, an online uncertainty survey, evidence verification, interim prioritisation and a final consensus workshop. RESULTS: Eighty-three research uncertainties yielded 11 final priorities across four sexual and reproductive health domains: sexual and reproductive health literacy, sexual violence prevention, accessible services and maternal health. A striking divergence emerged between youth and professional priorities only 3 achieved combined high-priority consensus. Youth prioritised a broader range of topics, including abortion access (rated high by youth but low by professionals), while professionals prioritised fewer areas. Two priorities achieved consensus: community-based maternal health support and barriers to reporting gender-based violence. CONCLUSION: This is the first priority setting partnership to identify sexual and reproductive health research priorities for migrant and refugee youth in Australia and to uniquely highlight substantial misalignment between youth and professional priorities. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: These identified priorities provide a foundation for targeted research, culturally responsive policy and more equitable sexual and reproductive health service provision for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults.

Australia↗