PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15131519

Evidence-based practice: how to evaluate what you read.

Abstract

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis are affected by the studies that are included or excluded. A number of biases are common including excluding unpublished data, non English language publications, and non indexed articles. In addition there can be a differential impact based on the quality and comparability of studies. In this article we review the potential significance of these biases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Ranga Rama Krishnan. 2003. Evidence-based practice: how to evaluate what you read.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15131519/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Acute and transient psychotic disorders (ICD-10: F23). Empirical data and implications for therapy].

The defining clinical features of acute and transient psychotic disorders (ICD-10: F23) are an acute onset and a duration of psychotic symptoms not exceeding 1-3 months. Previous empirical investigations show that patients with this diagnosis have a favourable prognosis, but also a high risk of relapses (58-77%). The diagnostic stability in the further course of illness seems to be low (34-73%) with a frequent diagnostic change to schizophrenia and affective disorders being observed. As yet, data from controlled clinical trials regarding therapy do not exist. The implications for the treatment of acute and transient psychotic disorders are discussed with this background.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗